610 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15878065)
21. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in normal children.
Quinn LM; Gardiner SK; Wheeler DT; Newkirk M; Johnson CA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):983-9. PubMed ID: 17046702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Comparative analysis of the results of microperimetry and conventional computed perimetry in health].
Shpak AA; Kachalina GF; Pedanova EK
Vestn Oftalmol; 2009; 125(3):31-4. PubMed ID: 19566046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.
Wall M; Punke SG; Stickney TL; Brito CF; Withrow KR; Kardon RH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Central visual field impairment during and following cystoid macular oedema.
Kiss CG; Barisani-Asenbauer T; Simader C; Maca S; Schmidt-Erfurth U
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17591669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.
Rohrschneider K; Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 15672526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Values for macular perimetry using the MP-1 microperimeter in normal subjects.
Shah VA; Chalam KV
Ophthalmic Res; 2009; 41(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18849636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of pupil perimetry and visual perimetry in normal eyes: decibel sensitivity and variability.
Hong S; Narkiewicz J; Kardon RH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Apr; 42(5):957-65. PubMed ID: 11274072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Assessment of the macula function by static perimetry, microperimetry and rarebit perimetry in patients suffering from dry age related macular degeneration].
Nowomiejska K; Oleszczuk A; Zubilewicz A; Krukowski J; Mańkowska A; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2007; 109(4-6):131-4. PubMed ID: 17725269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optic disc tomography and perimetry in controls, glaucoma suspects, and early and established glaucomas.
de la Rosa MG; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Lozano-Lopez V; Mendez MS; de la Vega RR
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 84(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 17220776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The different effects of aging on normal sensitivity in flicker and light-sense perimetry.
Lachenmayr BJ; Kojetinsky S; Ostermaier N; Angstwurm K; Vivell PM; Schaumberger M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 May; 35(6):2741-8. PubMed ID: 8188467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. MP1 AND MAIA FUNDUS PERIMETRY IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS AFFECTED BY RETINAL DYSTROPHIES.
Parodi MB; Triolo G; Morales M; Borrelli E; Cicinelli MV; Cascavilla ML; Bandello F
Retina; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1662-9. PubMed ID: 26214316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improving detection of mild loss of retinal light increment sensitivity at the posterior pole with the microperimeter MP1.
Bowl W; Lorenz B; Jäger M; Friedburg C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):4666-74. PubMed ID: 23716630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Feasibility and outcome of automated static perimetry in children using continuous light increment perimetry (CLIP) and fast threshold strategy.
Wabbels BK; Wilscher S
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Dec; 83(6):664-9. PubMed ID: 16396642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Fundus-oriented perimetry. Evaluation of a new visual field examination method for detecting angioscotoma].
Schiefer U; Stercken-Sorrenti G; Dietrich TJ; Friedrich M; Benda N
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996; 209(2-3):62-71. PubMed ID: 8992085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Free static threshold perimetry with the Goldmann perimeter].
Fischer FW
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1985 Apr; 186(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 3999619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Test time and efficiency of the dynamic strategy in glaucoma perimetry.
Weber J; Klimaschka T
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jan; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 7612076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
