209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15878228)
21. B cell increases and ex vivo IL-2 production as secondary endpoints for the detection of sensitizers in non-radioisotopic local lymph node assay using flow cytometry.
Jung KM; Jang WH; Lee YK; Yum YN; Sohn S; Kim BH; Chung JH; Park YH; Lim KM
Toxicol Lett; 2012 Mar; 209(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 22245253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Study of the sensitising potential of various textile dyes using a biphasic murine local lymph node assay.
Ahuja V; Platzek T; Fink H; Sonnenburg A; Stahlmann R
Arch Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 84(9):709-18. PubMed ID: 20585758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The regulatory use of the Local Lymph Node Assay for the notification of new chemicals in Europe.
Angers-Loustau A; Tosti L; Casati S
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Aug; 60(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 21539884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a toxicogenomic approach to the local lymph node assay (LLNA).
Boverhof DR; Gollapudi BB; Hotchkiss JA; Osterloh-Quiroz M; Woolhiser MR
Toxicol Sci; 2009 Feb; 107(2):427-39. PubMed ID: 19042947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sensitising potential of four textile dyes and some of their metabolites in a modified local lymph node assay.
Stahlmann R; Wegner M; Riecke K; Kruse M; Platzek T
Toxicology; 2006 Feb; 219(1-3):113-23. PubMed ID: 16388883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods.
Haneke KE; Tice RR; Carson BL; Margolin BH; Stokes WS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 11754531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation.
Basketter DA; Gerberick F; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17627643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A future approach to measuring relative skin sensitising potency: a proposal.
Jowsey IR; Basketter DA; Westmoreland C; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2006; 26(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 16773645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.
Dearman RJ; Betts CJ; Farr C; McLaughlin J; Berdasco N; Wiench K; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Oct; 57(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 17868217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Gene expression profiles in auricle skin as a possible additional endpoint for determination of sensitizers: A multi-endpoint evaluation of the local lymph node assay.
Tsuchiyama H; Maeda A; Nakajima M; Kitsukawa M; Takahashi K; Miyoshi T; Mutsuga M; Asaoka Y; Miyamoto Y; Oshida K
Toxicol Lett; 2017 Oct; 280():133-141. PubMed ID: 28826779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of an ex vivo murine local lymph node assay: multiple endpoint comparison.
Piccotti JR; Knight SA; Gillhouse K; Lagattuta MS; Bleavins MR
J Appl Toxicol; 2006; 26(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 16705757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of BALB/c and CBA/J mice for the local lymph node assay using bromodeoxyuridine with flow cytometry (LLNA: BrdU-FCM).
Lee YS; Yi JS; Seo SJ; Kim JH; Jung MS; Seo IK; Ahn I; Ko K; Kim TS; Lim KM; Sohn S
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 83():13-22. PubMed ID: 27816673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of LLNA group size on the identification and potency classification of skin sensitizers: a review of published data.
Basketter DA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2009; 28(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 19514920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Interlaboratory validation of the modified murine local lymph node assay based on adenosine triphosphate measurement.
Omori T; Idehara K; Kojima H; Sozu T; Arima K; Goto H; Hanada T; Ikarashi Y; Inoda T; Kanazawa Y; Kosaka T; Maki E; Morimoto T; Shinoda S; Shinoda N; Takeyoshi M; Tanaka M; Uratani M; Usami M; Yamanaka A; Yoneda T; Yoshimura I; Yuasa A
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2008; 58(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 18593646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of unsaturated compounds as assessed by the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT).
Kreiling R; Hollnagel HM; Hareng L; Eigler D; Lee MS; Griem P; Dreessen B; Kleber M; Albrecht A; Garcia C; Wendel A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):1896-904. PubMed ID: 18343554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. TIMES-SS--a promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity.
Patlewicz G; Dimitrov SD; Low LK; Kern PS; Dimitrova GD; Comber MI; Aptula AO; Phillips RD; Niemelä J; Madsen C; Wedebye EB; Roberts DW; Bailey PT; Mekenyan OG
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 48(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 17467128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18058304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating the sensitization potential of surfactants: integrating data from the local lymph node assay, guinea pig maximization test, and in vitro methods in a weight-of-evidence approach.
Ball N; Cagen S; Carrillo JC; Certa H; Eigler D; Emter R; Faulhammer F; Garcia C; Graham C; Haux C; Kolle SN; Kreiling R; Natsch A; Mehling A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Aug; 60(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 21645576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interlaboratory validation of 1% pluronic l92 surfactant as a suitable, aqueous vehicle for testing pesticide formulations using the murine local lymph node assay.
Boverhof DR; Wiescinski CM; Botham P; Lees D; Debruyne E; Repetto-Larsay M; Ladics G; Hoban D; Gamer A; Remmele M; Wang-Fan W; Ullmann LG; Mehta J; Billington R; Woolhiser MR
Toxicol Sci; 2008 Sep; 105(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 18556666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
