BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15879455)

  • 1. Ensemble dependence model for classification and prediction of cancer and normal gene expression data.
    Qiu P; Wang ZJ; Liu KJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3114-21. PubMed ID: 15879455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Independent component analysis-based penalized discriminant method for tumor classification using gene expression data.
    Huang DS; Zheng CH
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(15):1855-62. PubMed ID: 16709589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structured polychotomous machine diagnosis of multiple cancer types using gene expression.
    Koo JY; Sohn I; Kim S; Lee JW
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 22(8):950-8. PubMed ID: 16452113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dependence network modeling for biomarker identification.
    Qiu P; Wang ZJ; Liu KJ; Hu ZZ; Wu CH
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 17077095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiclass cancer classification and biomarker discovery using GA-based algorithms.
    Liu JJ; Cutler G; Li W; Pan Z; Peng S; Hoey T; Chen L; Ling XB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2691-7. PubMed ID: 15814557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A combination of rough-based feature selection and RBF neural network for classification using gene expression data.
    Chiang JH; Ho SH
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2008 Mar; 7(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 18334459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancer classification and prediction using logistic regression with Bayesian gene selection.
    Zhou X; Liu KY; Wong ST
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Aug; 37(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 15465478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for predicting disease subtypes in presence of misclassification among training samples using gene expression: application to human breast cancer.
    Zhang W; Rekaya R; Bertrand K
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 16267079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recursive gene selection based on maximum margin criterion: a comparison with SVM-RFE.
    Niijima S; Kuhara S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7():543. PubMed ID: 17187691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of replacing the unreliable cDNA microarray measurements on the disease classification based on gene expression profiles and functional modules.
    Wang D; Lv Y; Guo Z; Li X; Li Y; Zhu J; Yang D; Xu J; Wang C; Rao S; Yang B
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2883-9. PubMed ID: 16809389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust prostate cancer marker genes emerge from direct integration of inter-study microarray data.
    Xu L; Tan AC; Naiman DQ; Geman D; Winslow RL
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3905-11. PubMed ID: 16131522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kalman filtering for disease-state estimation from microarray data.
    Kelemen JZ; Kertész-Farkas A; Kocsor A; Puskás LG
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3047-53. PubMed ID: 17065158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomarker discovery in microarray gene expression data with Gaussian processes.
    Chu W; Ghahramani Z; Falciani F; Wild DL
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(16):3385-93. PubMed ID: 15937031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microarray-based classification and clinical predictors: on combined classifiers and additional predictive value.
    Boulesteix AL; Porzelius C; Daumer M
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1698-706. PubMed ID: 18544547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
    Gui J; Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constructing the gene regulation-level representation of microarray data for cancer classification.
    Wong HS; Wang HQ
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 17499026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of comprehensible models for gene expression datasets by subgroup discovery methodology.
    Gamberger D; Lavrac N; Zelezný F; Tolar J
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Aug; 37(4):269-84. PubMed ID: 15465480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting common gene expression patterns in multiple cancer outcome entities.
    Yang X; Bentink S; Spang R
    Biomed Microdevices; 2005 Sep; 7(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 16133813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ensemble machine learning on gene expression data for cancer classification.
    Tan AC; Gilbert D
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2003; 2(3 Suppl):S75-83. PubMed ID: 15130820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving molecular cancer class discovery through sparse non-negative matrix factorization.
    Gao Y; Church G
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(21):3970-5. PubMed ID: 16244221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.