These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1587946)

  • 1. Couples with exclusively female offspring have an increased probability of a male child after using male sex preselection.
    Ericsson SA; Ericsson RJ
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Mar; 7(3):372-3. PubMed ID: 1587946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex ratio of male sex preselected children born to couples with exclusively female offspring.
    Ericsson SA; Ericsson RJ
    Arch Androl; 1992; 28(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 1520036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex selection with biased technologies and its effect on the population sex ratio.
    Mason A; Bennett NG
    Demography; 1977 Aug; 14(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 268293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of sex preselection on the sex ratio of families.
    Rogerson PA
    J Hered; 1991; 82(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 2061595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sons and daughters--a sex preselection study.
    Simcock BW
    Med J Aust; 1985 May; 142(10):541-2. PubMed ID: 3857429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preselecting the sex of offspring: technologies, attitudes, and implications.
    Hartley SF; Pietraczyk LM
    Soc Biol; 1979; 26(3):232-46. PubMed ID: 298100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex preselection through albumin separation of sperm.
    Beernink FJ; Dmowski WP; Ericsson RJ
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Feb; 59(2):382-6. PubMed ID: 8425635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Son-biased sex ratios in the 2000 United States Census.
    Almond D; Edlund L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Apr; 105(15):5681-2. PubMed ID: 18378890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex preselection in New York City: who chooses which sex and why.
    Khatamee MA; Leinberger-Sica A; Matos P; Weseley AC
    Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(5):353-4. PubMed ID: 2571596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contraceptive use in Matlab, Bangladesh: the role of gender preference.
    Rahman M; Akbar J; Phillips JF; Becker S
    Stud Fam Plann; 1992; 23(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 1412596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethics of sex selection for family balancing. Why balance families?
    Dawson K; Trounson A
    Hum Reprod; 1996 Dec; 11(12):2577-8. PubMed ID: 9021352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preconceptional sex selection.
    Hewitt J
    Br J Hosp Med; 1987 Feb; 37(2):149, 151-2, 154-5. PubMed ID: 3470103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social aspects of > 800 couples coming forward for gender selection of their children.
    Liu P; Rose GA
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Apr; 10(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7650153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study on sex ratio at birth in suburban slums of Mumbai.
    Tragler A
    Indian J Public Health; 2011; 55(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 21941049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex preference and the value of sons and daughters in Nepal.
    Karki YB
    Stud Fam Plann; 1988; 19(3):169-78. PubMed ID: 3406965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male sex preselection through sperm isolation.
    Beernink FJ; Ericsson RJ
    Fertil Steril; 1982 Oct; 38(4):493-5. PubMed ID: 6956519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pre-assessment of preselection of the sex of children: the demographic aspect.
    Muhsam HV
    Genus; 1984; 40(3-4):5-23. PubMed ID: 12267212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of sex-ratio by birth order in an urban community in Manipur.
    Brogen AS; Shantibala K; Rajkumari B; Laishram J
    Indian J Public Health; 2009; 53(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 19806822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex selection technology utilization: further implications for sex ratio imbalance.
    Gilroy FD; Steinbacher R
    Soc Biol; 1991; 38(3-4):285-8. PubMed ID: 1801210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women's sex preferences in the United States: 1970 to 1975.
    Pebley AR; Westoff CF
    Demography; 1982 May; 19(2):177-89. PubMed ID: 7095215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.