132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15879480)
1. Mechanisms of enhanced shock-induced arrhythmogenesis in the rabbit heart with healed myocardial infarction.
Li L; Nikolski V; Wallick DW; Efimov IR; Cheng Y
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2005 Sep; 289(3):H1054-68. PubMed ID: 15879480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electroporation induced by internal defibrillation shock with and without recovery in intact rabbit hearts.
Wang YT; Efimov IR; Cheng Y
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2012 Aug; 303(4):H439-49. PubMed ID: 22730387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of shock-induced changes in transmembrane potential on reentrant waves and outcome during cardioversion of isolated rabbit hearts.
Evans FG; Ideker RE; Gray RA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Nov; 13(11):1118-27. PubMed ID: 12475103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanisms of shock-induced arrhythmogenesis during acute global ischemia.
Cheng Y; Mowrey KA; Nikolski V; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2002 Jun; 282(6):H2141-51. PubMed ID: 12003822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optical mapping of shock-induced arrhythmogenesis in the rabbit heart with healed myocardial infarction: fluorescent imaging with a photodiode array.
Cheng Y
Methods Mol Med; 2006; 129():149-61. PubMed ID: 17085810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanisms of superiority of ascending ramp waveforms: new insights into mechanisms of shock-induced vulnerability and defibrillation.
Qu F; Li L; Nikolski VP; Sharma V; Efimov IR
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2005 Aug; 289(2):H569-77. PubMed ID: 15792989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct evidence of the role of virtual electrode-induced phase singularity in success and failure of defibrillation.
Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Yamanouchi Y; Tchou PJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Aug; 11(8):861-8. PubMed ID: 10969748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation.
Efimov IR; Aguel F; Cheng Y; Wollenzier B; Trayanova N
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2000 Sep; 279(3):H1055-70. PubMed ID: 10993768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial distribution and extent of electroporation by strong internal shock in intact structurally normal and chronically infarcted rabbit hearts.
Kim SC; Vasanji A; Efimov IR; Cheng Y
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1080-9. PubMed ID: 18479336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of lidocaine on shock-induced vulnerability.
Li L; Nikolski V; Efimov IR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 14(10 Suppl):S237-48. PubMed ID: 14760929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual electrode-induced reexcitation: A mechanism of defibrillation.
Cheng Y; Mowrey KA; Van Wagoner DR; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR
Circ Res; 1999 Nov; 85(11):1056-66. PubMed ID: 10571537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional mechanisms of increased vulnerability to electric shocks in myocardial infarction: altered virtual electrode polarizations and conduction delay in the peri-infarct zone.
Rantner LJ; Arevalo HJ; Constantino JL; Efimov IR; Plank G; Trayanova NA
J Physiol; 2012 Sep; 590(18):4537-51. PubMed ID: 22586222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences between left and right ventricular chamber geometry affect cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.
RodrÃguez B; Li L; Eason JC; Efimov IR; Trayanova NA
Circ Res; 2005 Jul; 97(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 15976315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The probability of defibrillation success and the incidence of postshock arrhythmia as a function of shock strength.
Cates AW; Wolf PD; Hillsley RE; Souza JJ; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Jul; 17(7):1208-17. PubMed ID: 7937226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Panoramic imaging reveals basic mechanisms of induction and termination of ventricular tachycardia in rabbit heart with chronic infarction: implications for low-voltage cardioversion.
Ripplinger CM; Lou Q; Li W; Hadley J; Efimov IR
Heart Rhythm; 2009 Jan; 6(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 18996057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The mechanisms of the vulnerable window: the role of virtual electrodes and shock polarity.
Yamanouchi Y; Cheng Y; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2001 Jan; 79(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11201498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reversal of repolarization gradient does not reverse the chirality of shock-induced reentry in the rabbit heart.
Cheng Y; Nikolski V; Efimov IR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Sep; 11(9):998-1007. PubMed ID: 11021470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of ventricular fibrillation by T-wave field-shocks in the isolated perfused rabbit heart: role of nonuniform shock responses.
Kirchhof PF; Fabritz CL; Behrens S; Franz MR
Basic Res Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 92(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 9062650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel, minimally invasive, segmental myocardial infarction with a clear healed infarct borderzone in rabbits.
Ziv O; Schofield L; Lau E; Chaves L; Patel D; Jeng P; Peng X; Choi BR; Koren G
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2012 Jun; 302(11):H2321-30. PubMed ID: 22447944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arrhythmogenesis in experimental models of heart failure: the role of increased load.
Pye MP; Cobbe SM
Cardiovasc Res; 1996 Aug; 32(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 8796111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
