328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15879808)
1. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.
Abdelshehid C; Ahlering MT; Chou D; Park HK; Basillote J; Lee D; Kim I; Eichel L; Protsenko D; Wong B; McDougall E; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2017-21. PubMed ID: 15879808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes.
Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study.
Monga M; Best S; Venkatesh R; Ames C; Lee C; Kuskowski M; Schwartz S; Vanlangendock R; Skenazy J; Landman J
J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 16753388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the physical properties of four new generation flexible ureteroscopes: (de)flection, flow properties, torsion stiffness, and optical characteristics.
Paffen ML; Keizer JG; de Winter GV; Arends AJ; Hendrikx AJ
J Endourol; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2227-34. PubMed ID: 18831670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the mechanical, flow, and optical properties of contemporary flexible ureteroscopes.
Chiu KY; Cai Y; Marcovich R; El-Hakim A; Smith AD; Lee BR
Urology; 2003 Nov; 62(5):800-4. PubMed ID: 14624897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial.
Knudsen B; Miyaoka R; Shah K; Holden T; Turk TM; Pedro RN; Kriedberg C; Hinck B; Ortiz-Alvarado O; Monga M
Urology; 2010 Mar; 75(3):534-8. PubMed ID: 19854494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow matters: irrigation flow differs in flexible ureteroscopes of the newest generation.
Kruck S; Anastasiadis AG; Gakis G; Walcher U; Hennenlotter J; Merseburger AS; Stenzl A; Nagele U
Urol Res; 2011 Dec; 39(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 21442342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of fragmentation efficiency of flexible pneumatic lithotripsy using 2 flexible ureteroscopes.
Auge BK; Sekula JJ; Springhart WP; Zhu S; Zhong P; Preminger GM
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):967-70. PubMed ID: 15311011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr.
Afane JS; Olweny EO; Bercowsky E; Sundaram CP; Dunn MD; Shalhav AL; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1164-8. PubMed ID: 10992358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alteration in irrigant flow and deflection of flexible ureteroscopes with nitinol baskets.
Ames CD; Perrone JM; Weld KJ; Foyil KV; Yan Y; Venkatesh R; Landman J
J Endourol; 2006 Jan; 20(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 16426138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative study of two latest generation flexible ureterorenoscopes].
Traxer O; Pasqui F; Dubosq F; Chambade D; Beley S; Sebe P; Gattegno B; Thibault P
Prog Urol; 2005 Sep; 15(4):656-61. PubMed ID: 16459681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Working tools in flexible ureterorenoscopy--influence on flow and deflection: what does matter?
Bach T; Geavlete B; Herrmann TR; Gross AJ
J Endourol; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1639-43. PubMed ID: 18620506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are new-generation flexible ureteroscopes better than their predecessors?
Chiu KY; Cai Y; Marcovich R; Smith AD; Lee BR
BJU Int; 2004 Jan; 93(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 14678381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact on active scope deflection and irrigation flow of all endoscopic working tools during flexible ureteroscopy.
Pasqui F; Dubosq F; Tchala K; Tligui M; Gattegno B; Thibault P; Traxer O
Eur Urol; 2004 Jan; 45(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 14667517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bare naked baskets: ureteroscope deflection and flow characteristics with intact and disassembled ureteroscopic nitinol stone baskets.
Landman J; Monga M; El-Gabry EA; Rehman J; Lee DI; Bhayani S; Sundaram CP; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2377-9. PubMed ID: 11992041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach.
Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of optics and performance of single channel and a novel dual-channel fiberoptic ureteroscope.
Lusch A; Okhunov Z; del Junco M; Yoon R; Khanipour R; Menhadji A; Landman J
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):268-72. PubMed ID: 25530400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical properties of flexible ureteroscopes: implications for clinical practice.
Monga M; Anderson KJ; Durfee W
J Endourol; 2004 Jun; 18(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 15253821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage.
Sung JC; Springhart WP; Marguet CG; L'Esperance JO; Tan YH; Albala DM; Preminger GM
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 16286103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
