139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15880930)
1. Influence of air abrasion preparation on microleakage in glass ionomer cement restorations.
Reis Lda S; Chinelatti MA; Corona SA; Palma-Dibb RG; Borsatto MC
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1213-6. PubMed ID: 15880930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage on Class V glass ionomer restorations after cavity preparation with aluminum oxide air abrasion.
Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Rocha RA; Palma-Dibb RG
Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16113931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation.
Corona SA; Borsatto M; Dibb RG; Ramos RP; Brugnera A; Pécora JD
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 11551014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Borsatto MC; Pécora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):430-6. PubMed ID: 15279483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of various conditioner agents on the interdiffusion zone and microleakage of a glass lonomer cement with a high viscosity in primary teeth.
Yilmaz Y; Gurbuz T; Kocogullari ME
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 15765965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of glass ionomer restoration in cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth.
Rossi RR; Aranha AC; Eduardo Cde P; Ferreira LS; Navarro RS; Zezell DM
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 18647510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage evaluation of restorations prepared with air abrasion.
Guirguis R; Lee J; Conry J
Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(6):311-5. PubMed ID: 10509329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion.
Borsatto MC; Corona SA; Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; de Sá Rocha RA; Pecora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 16948375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chlorhexidine's effect on sealing ability of composite restorations following Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Geraldo-Martins VR; Robles FR; Matos AB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17618327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liner and light exposure: effect on in-vitro Class V microleakage.
Svizero Nda R; D'Alpino PH; da Silva e Souza MH; de Carvalho RM
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 15986952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars.
Wadenya R; Mante FK
Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 17867395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of class V glass ionomer restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation.
Delme KI; Deman PJ; Nammour S; De Moor RJ
Photomed Laser Surg; 2006 Dec; 24(6):715-22. PubMed ID: 17199471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars.
Guelmann M; Bookmyer KL; Villalta P; García-Godoy F
J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 15871455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation.
Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Pecora JD; De SA Rocha RA; Ramos TS; Palma-Dibb RG
J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 30(10):1008-14. PubMed ID: 12974861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of intermediate restorative materials.
Lim KC
J Endod; 1990 Mar; 16(3):116-8. PubMed ID: 2388027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of microleakage under a glass ionomer surface protector cement after different enamel treatment procedures.
Haznedaroglu E; Mentes AR; Tanboga I
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2012 Mar; 11(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 22488028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
