180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15881263)
1. Motion-onset VEPs to translating, radial, rotating and spiral stimuli.
Kremlácek J; Kuba M; Kubová Z; Chlubnová J
Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 109(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 15881263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of stimulus localisation on motion-onset VEP.
Kremlácek J; Kuba M; Chlubnová J; Kubová Z
Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):2989-3000. PubMed ID: 15474572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aging effect in pattern, motion and cognitive visual evoked potentials.
Kuba M; Kremláček J; Langrová J; Kubová Z; Szanyi J; Vít F
Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 62():9-16. PubMed ID: 22503557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simulated nystagmus reduces pattern-reversal more strongly than pattern-onset multifocal visual evoked potentials.
Hoffmann MB; Seufert PS
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 116(7):1723-32. PubMed ID: 15908272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motion and pattern cortical potentials in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder.
Constable PA; Gaigg SB; Bowler DM; Thompson DA
Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Dec; 125(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 22918709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is the motion system relatively spared in amblyopia? Evidence from cortical evoked responses.
Kubová Z; Kuba M; Juran J; Blakemore C
Vision Res; 1996 Jan; 36(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 8746252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Motion-onset visually evoked potential with nasal and temporal half- and full-field stimulation].
Göpfert E; Krug S; Orban D
Biomed Biochim Acta; 1991; 50(9):1135-40. PubMed ID: 1796904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of inter-hemispheric transfer in generating visual evoked potentials in V1-damaged brain hemispheres.
Kavcic V; Triplett RL; Das A; Martin T; Huxlin KR
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():82-93. PubMed ID: 25575450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Single and Paired Flash Visual Evoked Potentials.
Strigaro G; Mayer I; Chen JC; Cantello R; Rothwell JC
Clin EEG Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 46(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 25253432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perception of self-motion from peripheral optokinetic stimulation suppresses visual evoked responses to central stimuli.
Thilo KV; Kleinschmidt A; Gresty MA
J Neurophysiol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):723-30. PubMed ID: 12904491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of visual information processing in school-age dyslexics and normal readers via motion-onset visual evoked potentials.
Kubová Z; Kuba M; Kremláček J; Langrová J; Szanyi J; Vít F; Chutná M
Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):97-104. PubMed ID: 25913026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Topographical analysis of motion-triggered visual-evoked potentials in man.
Nakamura Y; Ohtsuka K
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1999; 43(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 10197741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Amplitude of the transient visual evoked potential (tVEP) as a function of achromatic and chromatic contrast: contribution of different visual pathways.
Souza GS; Gomes BD; Lacerda EM; Saito CA; da Silva Filho M; Silveira LC
Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 18321403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical configuration by stimulus onset visual evoked potentials (SO-VEPs) predicts performance on a motion direction discrimination task.
Zalar B; Martin T; Kavcic V
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):125-33. PubMed ID: 25889693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cortical evoked potentials due to motion contrast in the blind hemifield.
Benson PJ; Guo K; Hardiman MJ
Neuroreport; 1999 Nov; 10(17):3595-600. PubMed ID: 10619650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amplitudes of visually evoked cortical responses due to full-field stimulation and to stimulation with four half-fields.
Orban D; Müller W
Ophthalmologica; 1991; 202(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 2057192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the visual cortex selectively inhibits focal flash VEPs.
Kimura T; Ogata K; Nakazono H; Tobimatsu S
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 24468091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptation characteristics of steady-state motion visual evoked potentials.
Heinrich SP; Bach M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Jul; 114(7):1359-66. PubMed ID: 12842735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns.
Campbell J; Nielsen M; LaBrec A; Bean C
J Vis Exp; 2019 May; (147):. PubMed ID: 31132055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]