121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15881442)
1. Presidential address. Medical evidence in the criminal courts.
Davis N
Med Leg J; 2005; 73(Pt 1):3-15. PubMed ID: 15881442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Courts, politicians and constitutions.
Forrest R
Sci Justice; 2000; 40(4):227-8. PubMed ID: 11094819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The work of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.
Ogden M
Med Leg J; 1984; 52 ( Pt 4)():227-41. PubMed ID: 6527678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Standards in evidence.
Ebsworth E
Med Sci Law; 2001 Jan; 41(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11219116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical experts and the criminal courts. Clinical forensic medicine needs to become part of the syllabus.
Davies N
BMJ; 2003 May; 326(7397):1037. PubMed ID: 12749333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical experts and the criminal courts. Meaningful audit could be difficult to attain.
Gall JA
BMJ; 2003 May; 326(7397):1037. PubMed ID: 12742935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Affording brutality the cloak of law -- consent to medical examination of suspects and children.
McGleenan T
Med Sci Law; 1996 Jan; 36(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8907851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The UK legal system.
Rea K
Nursing (Lond); 1987 Feb; 3(14):537-9. PubMed ID: 3644186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Eye-witness testimony and judicial studies.
Heaton-Armstrong A
Med Sci Law; 1995 Apr; 35(2):93-4. PubMed ID: 7776872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A new look at the inquest in the light of Brodrick.
Pilling HH
Med Sci Law; 1978 Jan; 18(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 634068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lessons learned: the offensive use of medical evidence in criminal defense cases.
Oppenheim EB
Ann Health Law; 2010; 19(1 Spec No):167-71. PubMed ID: 21495566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA, not d.o.a.
Nat Genet; 1999 Mar; 21(3):243-4. PubMed ID: 10080165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Criminal law and forensic medicine in the 16th century].
Brettel HF; Emrich D
Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1991; 49():171-4. PubMed ID: 1811495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Causes célèbres. The Thomas Lund Lecture, delivered to the British Academy of Forensic Sciences on Tuesday 22 October 1991.
Usher A
Med Sci Law; 1992 Apr; 32(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 1614306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of DNA statistics in criminal trials.
Henderson JP
Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Aug; 128(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12175963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mental disorder and the courts. Report of joint BAFS/CBA/LCCSA 1993 seminar.
Med Sci Law; 1994 Jul; 34(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 7968403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reform of forensic autopsy in the German Code of Criminal Procedure].
Parzeller M; Dettmeyer R; Laux J; Bratzke H
Arch Kriminol; 2012; 229(3-4):73-89. PubMed ID: 22611906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiological illnesses and their potential for influencing testimony.
Norfolk GA
Med Sci Law; 1999 Apr; 39(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 10332157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. U.S. panel seeking restriction on use of DNA in courts.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11646944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Paranoia in the criminal courts.
Gunn J; Buchanan A
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 16773646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
