250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15881729)
1. Apically-extruded debris using the ProTaper system.
Azar NG; Ebrahimi G
Aust Endod J; 2005 Apr; 31(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15881729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.
Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
Logani A; Shah N
Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 18797091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.
Nagaveni SA; Balakoti KR; Smita K; Ratnakar P; Satish SV; Aravind T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1065-9. PubMed ID: 24858752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems.
Borges ÁH; Pereira TM; Porto AN; de Araújo Estrela CR; Miranda Pedro FL; Aranha AM; Guedes OA
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 26614016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files.
Topçuoğlu G; Topçuoğlu HS; Akpek F
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 26538300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques.
Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Er K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 18230395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
Bürklein S; Schäfer E
J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
Ferraz CC; Gomes NV; Gomes BP; Zaia AA; Teixeira FB; Souza-Filho FJ
Int Endod J; 2001 Jul; 34(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 11482718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris using Two Niti Systems Associated with Two İrrigation Techniques in Primary Teeth.
Gungor OE; Kustarci A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):490-495. PubMed ID: 27805889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Different Kinematics on Apical Extrusion of Irrigant and Debris during Canal Preparation Using K3XF Instruments.
Toyoğlu M; Altunbaş D
J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1565-1568. PubMed ID: 28735794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, Twisted File Adaptive, and HyFlex instruments.
Capar ID; Arslan H; Akcay M; Ertas H
J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1638-41. PubMed ID: 25260737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems.
Koçak MM; Çiçek E; Koçak S; Sağlam BC; Yılmaz N
Int Endod J; 2015 Mar; 48(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 24863544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of apically extruded debris in conventional and rotary instrumentation techniques.
Bidar M; Rastegar AF; Ghaziani P; Namazikhah MS
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Sep; 32(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 15553960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the effect of various irrigants on apically extruded debris after root canal preparation.
Parirokh M; Jalali S; Haghdoost AA; Abbott PV
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):196-9. PubMed ID: 22244635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement.
De-Deus G; Brandão MC; Barino B; Di Giorgi K; Fidel RA; Luna AS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 20727500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris and Irrigant Produced by Different Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Primary Teeth.
Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Nov; 16(11):864-8. PubMed ID: 26718292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
