These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15881747)

  • 1. [Sandimmun vs Neoral, comparison between two types of cyclosporine in patients with kidney transplantation].
    Cuero C; Vernaza A; Pérez E; Díaz Isaacs M
    Rev Med Panama; 2000; 25():38-41. PubMed ID: 15881747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Six-month clinical outcome of cyclosporine microemulsion formulation (Sigmasporin Microral) in stable renal transplant patients previously maintained on sandimmun neoral.
    Al Wakeel JS; Shaheen FA; Mathew MC; Abou Zeinab HM; Al Alfi A; Tarif NM; Al Mousawi MS; Mahmoud TS; Alorrayed AS; Fagir EA; Dham RS; Shaker DS
    Transplant Proc; 2008 Sep; 40(7):2245-51. PubMed ID: 18790205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical impact of 1:1 conversion from Neoral to a generic cyclosporine (Gengraf) in renal transplant recipients with stable graft function.
    Qazi YA; Forrest A; Tornatore K; Venuto RC
    Clin Transplant; 2006; 20(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16824147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Therapeutic equivalence and mg:mg switch ability of a generic cyclosporine microemulsion formulation (Sigmasporin Microral) in stable renal transplant patients maintained on Sandimmun Neoral.
    Al Wakeel JS; Shaheen FA; Mathew MC; Abouzeinab HM; Al Alfi A; Tarif NM; Al Mousawi MS; Mahmoud TS; Alorrayed AS; Fagir EA; Dham RS; Shaker DS
    Transplant Proc; 2008 Sep; 40(7):2252-7. PubMed ID: 18790206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety of switching stable renal transplant patients from Sandimmun to Sandimmun Neoral.
    Loo CS; Morad Z; Lim TO; Fan KS; Suleiman AB
    Transplant Proc; 1996 Jun; 28(3):1328-9. PubMed ID: 8658680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and tolerability of a new oral formulation of cyclosporin A, Sandimmun Neoral, in renal transplant patients.
    Taesch S; Niese D
    Transpl Int; 1994; 7 Suppl 1():S263-6. PubMed ID: 11271220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neoral induction in pediatric renal transplantation.
    Bunchman TE; Parekh RS; Flynn JT; Smoyer WE; Kershaw DB; Valentini RP; Pontillo BJ; Sandvordenker J; Brown C; Sedman AB
    Pediatr Nephrol; 1998 Jan; 12(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 9502556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paired kidney analysis of tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion-based therapy in Chinese cadaveric renal transplant recipients.
    Cheung CY; Wong KM; Chan HW; Liu YL; Chan YH; Wong HS; Chak WL; Choi KS; Chau KF; Li CS
    Transpl Int; 2006 Aug; 19(8):657-66. PubMed ID: 16827683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Switchability of neoral and equoral according to Food and Drug Administration rules and regulations.
    Masri MA; Haberal M; Rizvi A; Stephan A; Bilgin N; Naqvi A; Barbari A; Kamel G; Zafar N; Emiroğlu R; Colak T; Manzoor K; Matha V; Kamarad V; Rost M; Rizk S; Hazime A; Perlik F
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Sep; 37(7):2988-93. PubMed ID: 16213282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year results of a randomized, single-center study of tacrolimus vs microemulsion cyclosporine in heart transplant patients.
    Kobashigawa JA; Patel J; Furukawa H; Moriguchi JD; Yeatman L; Takemoto S; Marquez A; Shaw J; Oeser BT; Subherwal S; Wu GW; Kawano J; Laks H
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 Apr; 25(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 16563974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [C0 vs C2 levels and their implications in kidney transplantation].
    Cuero C; Delgado E; de González M; Medina C; Vernaza A; Moscoso J
    Rev Med Panama; 2002; 27():30-3. PubMed ID: 16737196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monitoring C2 level predicts exposure in maintenance lung transplant patients receiving the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral).
    Jaksch P; Kocher A; Neuhauser P; Sarahrudi K; Seweryn J; Wisser W; Klepetko W
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2005 Aug; 24(8):1076-80. PubMed ID: 16102443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-year observation of kidney allograft recipients converted from cyclosporine microemulsion to tacrolimus.
    Chamienia A; Biedunkiewicz B; Król E; Debska-Slizień A; Rutkowski B
    Transplant Proc; 2006; 38(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 16504670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Four-year data after pediatric renal transplantation: a randomized trial of tacrolimus vs. cyclosporin microemulsion.
    Filler G; Webb NJ; Milford DV; Watson AR; Gellermann J; Tyden G; Grenda R; Vondrak K; Hughes D; Offner G; Griebel M; Brekke IB; McGraw M; Balzar E; Friman S; Trompeter R
    Pediatr Transplant; 2005 Aug; 9(4):498-503. PubMed ID: 16048603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of generic cyclosporine microemulsion versus neoral in de novo renal transplant recipients managed by 2-hour postdose monitoring.
    Sharma A; Shekhar C; Heer M; Minz M
    Transplant Proc; 2006 Sep; 38(7):2051-3. PubMed ID: 16979996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stable kidney function in the second decade after kidney transplantation while on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.
    Kandaswamy R; Humar A; Casingal V; Gillingham KJ; Ibrahim H; Matas AJ
    Transplantation; 2007 Mar; 83(6):722-6. PubMed ID: 17414704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advantages of Neoral conversion in renal transplant patients.
    Vennarecci G; Pisani F; Tisone G; Buonomo O; Famulari A; Casciani CU
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 1998 Jun; 50(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 9707972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and economic outcomes of rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction in adults who received kidney transplants from living unrelated donors and received cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.
    Miller JT; Collins CD; Stuckey LJ; Luan FL; Englesbe MJ; Magee JC; Park JM
    Pharmacotherapy; 2009 Oct; 29(10):1166-74. PubMed ID: 19792990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cyclosporine concentrations 2 hours post-dose determined using 3 different methods and trough level in pediatric renal transplantation.
    Rodríguez E; Delucchi MA; Cano F; Valdebenito S; Castillo MC; Villegas R
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Oct; 37(8):3354-7. PubMed ID: 16298594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of liver function in renal transplant recipients undergoing C2-monitoring for cyclosporine.
    Hecking M; Kainz A; Schillinger M; Posch C; Birsan T; Rasoul-Rockenschaub S; Böhmig GA; Schmaldienst S; Watschinger B; Hörl WH; Mühlbacher F; Säemann MD
    Transpl Int; 2008 Mar; 21(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 17903183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.