148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15881941)
1. [Relationships between the probiotic and host indigenous lactobacilli under the conditions of mixed cultivation in vitro].
Glushanova NA; Shenderov BA
Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 2005; (2):56-61. PubMed ID: 15881941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus species having potential for use as probiotic cultures for dogs.
McCoy S; Gilliland SE
J Food Sci; 2007 Apr; 72(3):M94-7. PubMed ID: 17995807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Isolation and characterization of probiotic properties of Lactobacilli isolated from rat fecal microbiota.
Jena PK; Trivedi D; Thakore K; Chaudhary H; Giri SS; Seshadri S
Microbiol Immunol; 2013 Jun; 57(6):407-16. PubMed ID: 23773019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from the feces of breast-fed infants and Taiwanese pickled cabbage.
Wang CY; Lin PR; Ng CC; Shyu YT
Anaerobe; 2010 Dec; 16(6):578-85. PubMed ID: 20951815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of correlation between in vitro antibiosis and in vivo protection against enteropathogenic bacteria by probiotic lactobacilli.
Bujalance C; Jiménez-Valera M; Moreno E; Ruiz-López MD; Lasserrot A; Ruiz-Bravo A
Res Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 165(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 24140789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification method based on PCR combined with automated ribotyping for tracking probiotic Lactobacillus strains colonizing the human gut and vagina.
Massi M; Vitali B; Federici F; Matteuzzi D; Brigidi P
J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 96(4):777-86. PubMed ID: 15012816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antagonistic activity of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against entero- and uropathogens.
Hütt P; Shchepetova J; Lõivukene K; Kullisaar T; Mikelsaar M
J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 100(6):1324-32. PubMed ID: 16696680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of vaginal lactobacilli with potential probiotic properties isolated from women in North Lebanon.
Al Kassaa I; Hamze M; Hober D; Chihib NE; Drider D
Microb Ecol; 2014 Apr; 67(3):722-34. PubMed ID: 24549747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Pessoa WFB; Melgaço ACC; de Almeida ME; Ramos LP; Rezende RP; Romano CC
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3264194. PubMed ID: 29226130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolation and characterization of faecal bifidobacteria and lactobacilli isolated from dogs and primates.
Strompfová V; Lauková A
Anaerobe; 2014 Oct; 29():108-12. PubMed ID: 24239978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains feeding on fecal lactobacilli and weight gains in chicken.
Lan PT; Binh le T; Benno Y
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2003 Feb; 49(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12682864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probiotic properties of lactobacilli species isolated from children's feces.
Tulumoglu S; Yuksekdag ZN; Beyatli Y; Simsek O; Cinar B; Yaşar E
Anaerobe; 2013 Dec; 24():36-42. PubMed ID: 24055630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of indigenous vaginal lactobacilli from healthy women as probiotic candidates.
Martín R; Soberón N; Vaneechoutte M; Flórez AB; Vázquez F; Suárez JE
Int Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 11(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 19204898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterisation and selection of a Lactobacillus species to re-colonise the vagina of women with recurrent bacterial vaginosis.
McLEAN NW; Rosenstein IJ
J Med Microbiol; 2000 Jun; 49(6):543-552. PubMed ID: 10847208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro evaluation of the safety and probiotic properties of Lactobacilli isolated from chicken and calves.
Bujnakova D; Strakova E; Kmet V
Anaerobe; 2014 Oct; 29():118-27. PubMed ID: 24291759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urogenital pathogen inhibition and compatibility between vaginal Lactobacillus strains to be considered as probiotic candidates.
Juárez Tomás MS; Saralegui Duhart CI; De Gregorio PR; Vera Pingitore E; Nader-Macías ME
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 21862199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multifactorial inhibition of Candida albicans by combinations of lactobacilli and probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856.
Spacova I; Allonsius CN; De Boeck I; Oerlemans E; Tuyaerts I; Van de Vliet N; van den Broek MFL; Jimenez L; Boyer M; Rodriguez B; Ballet N; Lebeer S
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9365. PubMed ID: 38654026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inhibition of Clostridium difficile strains by intestinal Lactobacillus species.
Naaber P; Smidt I; Štšepetova J; Brilene T; Annuk H; Mikelsaar M
J Med Microbiol; 2004 Jun; 53(Pt 6):551-554. PubMed ID: 15150337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Probiotic potential comparison of Lactobacillus strains isolated from Iranian traditional food products and human feces with standard probiotic strains.
Joghataei M; Shahidi F; Pouladfar G; Mortazavi SA; Ghaderi A
J Sci Food Agric; 2019 Dec; 99(15):6680-6688. PubMed ID: 31328278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of faecal Lactobacillus populations in experimental animals from different breeding facilities and possible consequences for probiotic studies.
de Waard R; Snel J; Bokken GC; Tan PS; Schut F; Huis In't Veld JH
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2002; 34(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 11849504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
