These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15882331)

  • 1. Fractal travel time estimates for dispersive contaminants.
    Clarke DD; Meerschaert MM; Wheatcraft SW
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 15882331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Backward location and travel time probabilities for a decaying contaminant in an aquifer.
    Neupauer RM; Wilson JL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Oct; 66(1-2):39-58. PubMed ID: 14516940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Travel time and trajectory moments of conservative solutes in two-dimensional convergent flows.
    Riva M; Sánchez-Vila X; Guadagnini A; De Simoni M; Willmann M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):23-43. PubMed ID: 16216383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating contaminant attenuation half-lives in alluvial groundwater systems.
    Tardiff MF; Katzman D
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Mar; 9(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 17344953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contaminant degradation in physically and chemically heterogeneous aquifers.
    Cunningham JA; Fadel ZJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Dec; 94(3-4):293-304. PubMed ID: 17854951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uncertainty assessment of contaminant plume length estimates in heterogeneous aquifers.
    Beyer C; Bauer S; Kolditz O
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Sep; 87(1-2):73-95. PubMed ID: 16781794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of groundwater contamination using concentration-time series recorded during an integral pumping test: bias introduced by strong concentration gradients within the plume.
    Zeru A; Schäfer G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Dec; 81(1-4):106-24. PubMed ID: 16216382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Key features of artificial aquifers for use in modeling contaminant transport.
    Close M; Bright J; Wang F; Pang L; Manning M
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(6):814-28. PubMed ID: 18657117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Redistribution of contaminants by a fluctuating water table in a micro-porous, double-porosity aquifer: field observations and model simulations.
    Fretwell BA; Burgess WG; Barker JA; Jefferies NL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Jun; 78(1-2):27-52. PubMed ID: 15949606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterisation of a DNAPL source zone in a porous aquifer using the Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test and an inverse modelling approach.
    Dridi L; Pollet I; Razakarisoa O; Schäfer G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Jun; 107(1-2):22-44. PubMed ID: 19395120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calculation of elapsed decimal time for tracing studies.
    Field MS
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 18181874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of temporally variable groundwater flow conditions on point measurements and contaminant mass flux estimations.
    Rein A; Bauer S; Dietrich P; Beyer C
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Sep; 108(3-4):118-33. PubMed ID: 19682766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulsed pumping process optimization using a potential flow model.
    Tenney CM; Lastoskie CM
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):111-21. PubMed ID: 17350717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of reactive well networks for remediating heterogeneous aquifers.
    Hudak PF
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2008 Jun; 43(7):731-7. PubMed ID: 18444075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analytical solution to transport in three-dimensional heterogeneous well capture zones.
    Indelman P; Lessoff SC; Dagan G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Sep; 87(1-2):1-21. PubMed ID: 16844264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model-based prediction of long-term leaching of contaminants from secondary materials in road constructions and noise protection dams.
    Beyer C; Konrad W; Rügner H; Bauer S; Liedl R; Grathwohl P
    Waste Manag; 2009 Feb; 29(2):839-50. PubMed ID: 18707860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computing "anomalous" contaminant transport in porous media: the CTRW MATLAB toolbox.
    Cortis A; Berkowitz B
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):947-50. PubMed ID: 16324017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Well vulnerability: a quantitative approach for source water protection.
    Frind EO; Molson JW; Rudolph DL
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):732-42. PubMed ID: 16961495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anthropogenic contaminants as tracers in an urbanizing karst aquifer.
    Mahler B; Massei N
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Apr; 91(1-2):81-106. PubMed ID: 17161500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the link between contaminant source release conditions and plume prediction uncertainty.
    de Barros FP; Nowak W
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jul; 116(1-4):24-34. PubMed ID: 20541835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.