BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15882470)

  • 1. Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis.
    Hozo I; Djulbegovic B; Clark O; Lyman GH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 May; 5():17. PubMed ID: 15882470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study inclusion criteria and presentation of results in a meta-analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for prevention of febrile neutropenia.
    Lathia N; Isogai PK; Cheung MC; Mittmann N
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Dec; 28(36):e762-3; author reply e764. PubMed ID: 21079143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ratio of means for analyzing continuous outcomes in meta-analysis performed as well as mean difference methods.
    Friedrich JO; Adhikari NK; Beyene J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 21447428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Clark OA; Lyman GH; Castro AA; Clark LG; Djulbegovic B
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jun; 23(18):4198-214. PubMed ID: 15961767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
    Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.
    Higgins JP; Whitehead A
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2733-49. PubMed ID: 8981683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Specification of covariance structure in longitudinal data analysis for randomized clinical trials.
    Lu K; Mehrotra DV
    Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(4):474-88. PubMed ID: 20020423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.
    Peters JL; Mengersen KL
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 19018929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adjusting for observable selection bias in block randomized trials.
    Ivanova A; Barrier RC; Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1537-46. PubMed ID: 15723426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor decrease febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy in children with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Sung L; Nathan PC; Lange B; Beyene J; Buchanan GR
    J Clin Oncol; 2004 Aug; 22(16):3350-6. PubMed ID: 15310780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A note on dealing with missing standard errors in meta-analyses of continuous outcome measures in WinBUGS.
    Stevens JW
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 21394888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.
    LeLorier J; Grégoire G; Benhaddad A; Lapierre J; Derderian F
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):536-42. PubMed ID: 9262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
    Villar J; Carroli G
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Colony stimulating factors in chemotherapy induced neutropenic fever].
    Sanz Rubiales A; García Alvarez G; Centeno Cortés C; Martín Ortega Y; Del Valle Rivero AL; Nieto Sanz J
    An Med Interna; 1998 Feb; 15(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 9542208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fallacy of enrolling only high-risk subjects in cancer prevention trials: is there a "free lunch"?
    Baker SG; Kramer BS; Corle D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Oct; 4():24. PubMed ID: 15461821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data.
    Riley RD; Lambert PC; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Thijs L; Boutitie F
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1870-93. PubMed ID: 18069721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.