These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 158826)

  • 1. Telecommunication performance of persons with hearing handicap in relation to speech reception threshold.
    Nielsen HB; Gilberg I
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 158826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telephone performance of persons with hearing handicap in relation to speech reception threshold.
    Nielsen HB; Gilberg I
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (Suppl 8):232-8. PubMed ID: 299112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes.
    Tannahill JC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 6887805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Wagener KC; Frachet B; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):378-87. PubMed ID: 20380611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 3950200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reading Behind the Lines: The Factors Affecting the Text Reception Threshold in Hearing Aid Users.
    Zekveld AA; Pronk M; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):762-775. PubMed ID: 29450534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Please try harder! The influence of hearing status and evaluative feedback during listening on the pupil dilation response, saliva-cortisol and saliva alpha-amylase levels.
    Zekveld AA; van Scheepen JAM; Versfeld NJ; Veerman ECI; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107768. PubMed ID: 31387070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results from the Dutch speech-in-noise screening test by telephone.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15692307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Telephone usage in the hearing-impaired population.
    Kepler LJ; Terry M; Sweetman RH
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):311-9. PubMed ID: 1487091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An adaptive noise canceller for hearing aids using two nearby microphones.
    Vanden Berghe J; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3621-6. PubMed ID: 9637043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. User evaluation of a communication system that automatically generates captions to improve telephone communication.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Trends Amplif; 2009 Mar; 13(1):44-68. PubMed ID: 19126551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing AIDS.
    Luts H; Maj JB; Soede W; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 15599189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.