502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15882712)
1. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy.
Derweesh IH; Goldfarb DA; Abreu SC; Goel M; Flechner SM; Modlin C; Zhou L; Streem SB; Novick AC; Gill IS
Urology; 2005 May; 65(5):862-6. PubMed ID: 15882712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Older living donors provide excellent quality kidneys: a single center experience (older living donors).
Johnson SR; Khwaja K; Pavlakis M; Monaco AP; Hanto DW
Clin Transplant; 2005 Oct; 19(5):600-6. PubMed ID: 16146550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes.
Renoult E; Hubert J; Ladrière M; Billaut N; Mourey E; Feuillu B; Kessler M
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Feb; 21(2):472-7. PubMed ID: 16204289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: impact on an established renal transplant program.
Shafizadeh S; McEvoy JR; Murray C; Baillie GM; Ashcraft E; Sill T; Rogers J; Baliga P; Rajagopolan PR; Chavin K
Am Surg; 2000 Dec; 66(12):1132-5. PubMed ID: 11149584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome of renal transplantation with multiple versus single renal arteries after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparative study.
Desai MR; Ganpule AP; Gupta R; Thimmegowda M
Urology; 2007 May; 69(5):824-7. PubMed ID: 17482914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a single-center sequential experience comparing hand-assisted versus standard technique.
Kocak B; Baker TB; Koffron AJ; Leventhal JR
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1060-3. PubMed ID: 18158014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the conventional open approach.
Brown SL; Biehl TR; Rawlins MC; Hefty TR
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):766-9. PubMed ID: 11176463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic vs open living donor nephrectomy: a contemporary series from one centre.
Power RE; Preston JM; Griffin A; Martin I; Wall DR; Nicol DL
BJU Int; 2006 Jul; 98(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 16831157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do multiple renal arteries restrict laparoscopic donor nephrectomy?
Gürkan A; Kaçar S; Başak K; Varilsüha C; Karaca C
Transplant Proc; 2004; 36(1):105-7. PubMed ID: 15013314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-year experience of adoption and evolution of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: results from a center without large volume of patients.
Hung CJ; Lin YJ; Chang SS; Chou TC; Chuang JP; Chung PY; Lin YS; Lee PC
Transplant Proc; 2008 Sep; 40(7):2112-4. PubMed ID: 18790167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The living kidney donor: laparoscopy versus open surgery].
Facundo C; Guirado L; Díaz JM; Sainz Z; Alcaraz A; Rosales A; Solà R
Nefrologia; 2005; 25 Suppl 2():62-6. PubMed ID: 16050405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Open and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: activity and outcomes from all Australasian transplant centers.
Brook NR; Gibbons N; Nicol DL; McDonald SP
Transplantation; 2010 Jun; 89(12):1482-8. PubMed ID: 20418804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes.
Ruiz-Deya G; Cheng S; Palmer E; Thomas R; Slakey D
J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1270-3; discussion 1273-4. PubMed ID: 11547056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the pediatric recipient in a dual-site program.
Bergman S; Feifer A; Feldman LS; Bell L; Flageole H; Tchervenkov J; Anidjar M; Stanbridge D; Fried GM
Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Jun; 11(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 17493225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: effects of learning curve on surgical outcomes.
Martin GL; Guise AI; Bernie JE; Bargman V; Goggins W; Sundaram CP
Transplant Proc; 2007; 39(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 17275468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maintaining urine production and early allograft function during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
Bolte SL; Chin LT; Moon TD; D'Alessandro AM; Nakada SY; Becker YT; Hedican SP
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):747-50. PubMed ID: 17070346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term impact of pneumoperitoneum used for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on renal function and histomorphology in donor and recipient rats.
Hazebroek EJ; de Bruin RW; Bouvy ND; Marquet RL; Bonthuis F; Bajema IM; Hayes DP; Ijzermans JN; Bonjer HJ
Ann Surg; 2003 Mar; 237(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 12616118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open technique and how to reach quality standards: a single-center experience in Thailand.
Taweemonkongsap T; Nualyong C; Amornvesukit T; Srinualnad S; Jitpraphai S; Premasathian N; Sujijantararat P; Tantiwong A; Soontrapa S
Transplant Proc; 2011 Dec; 43(10):3593-8. PubMed ID: 22172811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Routine use of renal-dose dopamine during living donor nephrectomy has no beneficial effect to either donor or recipient.
O'Dair J; Evans L; Rigg KM; Shehata M
Transplant Proc; 2005 Mar; 37(2):637-9. PubMed ID: 15848484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open donor nephrectomy: recipient's perspective.
Jamale TE; Hase NK; Iqbal AM
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2012 Nov; 23(6):1175-80. PubMed ID: 23168845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
