These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15883115)

  • 1. Time course analysis of closed- and open-loop grasping of the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Heath M; Rival C; Westwood DA; Neely K
    J Mot Behav; 2005 May; 37(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 15883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual feedback schedules influence visuomotor resistance to the Müller-Lyer figures.
    Heath M; Rival C; Neely K
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 16175361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of the visuomotor system in on-line attenuation of a premovement illusory bias in grip aperture.
    Heath M; Rival C
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 15708199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.
    Bruno N; Franz VH
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1421-33. PubMed ID: 19059422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Heath M; Rival C; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 15278330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of visual illusions on grasping.
    Franz VH; Fahle M; Bülthoff HH; Gegenfurtner KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Oct; 27(5):1124-44. PubMed ID: 11642699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of the Uznadze illusion is temporally dynamic in closed-loop but temporally constant in open-loop grasping.
    Uccelli S; Bruno N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jun; 77(6):1238-1249. PubMed ID: 37784227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.
    Westwood DA; McEachern T; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 11713628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The visual coding of grip aperture shows an early but not late adherence to Weber's law.
    Heath M; Mulla A; Holmes SA; Smuskowitz LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Mar; 490(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 21194553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: the contributions of vision for perception in action.
    van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; Savelsbergh GJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1939-47. PubMed ID: 17240408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.
    Heath M; Rival C; Neely K; Krigolson O
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 16292638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Allocentric visual cues influence online limb adjustments.
    Heath M; Neely K; Binsted G
    Motor Control; 2007 Jan; 11(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 17392567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Jun; 25(3):349-71. PubMed ID: 16707178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.
    Franz VH; Hesse C; Kollath S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1518-31. PubMed ID: 18834894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension.
    Westwood DA; Heath M; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Oct; 134(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 11081827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptation effects in grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Kopiske KK; Cesanek E; Campagnoli C; Domini F
    Vision Res; 2017 Jul; 136():21-31. PubMed ID: 28571701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set.
    Tang R; Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():49-63. PubMed ID: 25704582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.