BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15883394)

  • 21. More gold and more fleece: improving the legal sanctions against medical research fraud.
    O'Reilly JT
    Adm Law Rev; 1990; 42(3):393-422. PubMed ID: 15991411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Misconduct? It's all academic..
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retraction notice.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
    Miller DR
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Notice of retraction: final resolution.
    Sox HC
    Ann Intern Med; 2005 May; 142(9):798. PubMed ID: 15845952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The long road to retraction.
    Nat Med; 2003 Sep; 9(9):1093. PubMed ID: 12949503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
    Couzin J; Unger K
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Data fabrication and article retraction: how not to get lost in the woods.
    Eisenach JC
    Anesthesiology; 2009 May; 110(5):955-6. PubMed ID: 19262370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
    Unger K; Couzin J
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Iranian paper sparks sense of déjà vu.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7216):1019. PubMed ID: 18948918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dealing with charges of scientific misconduct.
    Galyean M
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1035. PubMed ID: 18417753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Scientific misconduct is fraud].
    Hahn R
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Sep 11-17; 110(37):1614. PubMed ID: 24163936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Negative results.
    Nature; 2008 May; 453(7193):258. PubMed ID: 18480760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Misconduct row fuels calls for reform.
    Dennis C
    Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6976):666. PubMed ID: 14973447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Half way to real reform.
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7145):613. PubMed ID: 17554266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Confidentiality is essential in misconduct inquiries.
    Mason S; Rutledge C
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7135):492. PubMed ID: 17392764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Research in anesthesia: fraud, police and professionalism].
    Donati F
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 Jan; 32(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 23260629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cognition research. Investigation leaves field in the dark about a colleague's work.
    Miller G
    Science; 2010 Aug; 329(5994):890-1. PubMed ID: 20724607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scientific misconduct. Science retracts discredited paper; bitter patent dispute continues.
    Normile D
    Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):450-1. PubMed ID: 19390012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. U.S. research earmarks. Building a scientific legacy on a controversial foundation.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5888):480-3. PubMed ID: 18653857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.