These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15884520)

  • 1. Interpreting automated perimetry.
    Thomas R; George R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 49(2):125-40. PubMed ID: 15884520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated achromatic perimetry.
    Aggarwal A; Chhabra K; Kaur P; Singh K; Khosa I; Bansal P
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2018; 11(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 29563687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 16865008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis.
    Sakata LM; DeLeón-Ortega J; Girkin CA
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of posterior capsular opacification removal on automated perimetry.
    García-Medina JJ; García-Medina M; Arbona-Nadal MT; Pinazo-Duran MD
    Eye (Lond); 2006 May; 20(5):537-45. PubMed ID: 15905871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of an effective visual field testing strategy for a normal pediatric population.
    Akar Y; Yilmaz A; Yucel I
    Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 18617757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new method for eyelid elevation in glaucoma patients with ptosis during automated perimetry testing.
    Nesher R; Almog Y; Gorck L; Epstein E; Trick GL
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Mar; 16(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 17473742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretation of automated perimetry.
    Zeyen T
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1997; 267():191-7. PubMed ID: 9745830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Sarić D; Mandić Z; Iveković R; Geber MZ; Benić G; Tomić Z; Grgić D
    Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Interpretation of visual field with Humphrey Zeiss Analyser].
    Brătulescu M; Zemba M
    Oftalmologia; 2002; 53(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 12474453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardized visual field assessment for patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy.
    Gordon LK; Goldhardt R; Holland GN; Yu F; Levinson RD
    Ocul Immunol Inflamm; 2006 Dec; 14(6):325-32. PubMed ID: 17162602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.