508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15886439)
1. Low-cost oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors: device repeatability and device differences.
Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 15886439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.
Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 16019880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings.
de Greeff A; Nathan H; Stafford N; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 19020425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Devices for blood pressure self measurement: tested in comparison.
Anlauf M; Tholl U; Högermeyer D; Hirche H; Roggenbuck U; Simonides R
Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():20-5. PubMed ID: 8896295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Home blood pressure measurement with oscillometric upper-arm devices.
Braam RL; Thien T
Neth J Med; 2003 Oct; 61(10):307-12. PubMed ID: 14708907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An optical oscillometric method for neonatal and premature infant blood pressure monitoring.
Roeder RA; Geddes LA
Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Apr; 9(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19363328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-invasive oscillometric wrist and upper arm blood pressure measurements compared with invasive values.
Saul F; Klaus D; Aristidou Y; Wiemeyer A; Lösse B
Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():127-9. PubMed ID: 8896316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Artsana CS 410 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Natalizi A; Gerosa PF; Frigerio M; Omboni S; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 18496297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oscillometric blood pressure measurements: differences between measured and calculated mean arterial pressure.
Kiers HD; Hofstra JM; Wetzels JF
Neth J Med; 2008 Dec; 66(11):474-9. PubMed ID: 19075313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by brachial artery displacement method in high-risk surgical patients.
Weiss BM; Spahn DR; Keller E; Seifert B; Pasch T
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1995 Nov; 12(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 8665877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?
Amoore JN; Scott DH
Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 10828894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
