508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15886439)
21. [Errors in blood pressure measuring with modern automated machines. Effects of errors in non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure measuring].
Forstner K
Fortschr Med; 1999 Apr; 117(10):22-5. PubMed ID: 10384743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement: description of the method used.
Wonka F
Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():1-7. PubMed ID: 8896292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients.
Bur A; Herkner H; Vlcek M; Woisetschläger C; Derhaschnig U; Delle Karth G; Laggner AN; Hirschl MM
Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3):793-9. PubMed ID: 12626986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of sphygmomanometric and oscillometric methods of blood pressure measurements in adult in-patients.
Amadasun FE; Isa JI
Niger J Clin Pract; 2005 Dec; 8(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 16477859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.
Amoore JN
Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 10828893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy assessment of a novel blood pressure measurement device in a South African adult population: Tensoval duo control.
de Greeff A; Hezelgrave N; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Dec; 16(6):304-6. PubMed ID: 22027814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Oscillometric wrist blood pressure measuring devices.
Braam RL; Asian B; Thien T
Neth J Med; 2003 Oct; 61(10):313-7. PubMed ID: 14708908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of high definition oscillometric and Doppler ultrasonic devices for measuring blood pressure in anaesthetised cats.
Petric AD; Petra Z; Jerneja S; Alenka S
J Feline Med Surg; 2010 Oct; 12(10):731-7. PubMed ID: 20615734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of clothes on sphygmomanometric and oscillometric blood pressure measurement.
Liebl M; Holzgreve H; Schulz M; Crispin A; Bogner J
Blood Press; 2004; 13(5):279-82. PubMed ID: 15545150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison between the oscillometric and the auscultatory method for ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring.
Wiinberg N; Raymond IE; Bang LE; Malmqvist BB; Svendsen TL; Petersen LJ
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Jun; 1(3):187-191. PubMed ID: 10226224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Gkinos CP; Patouras JD
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 17496469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
