These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15886630)

  • 1. The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.
    Todt I; Basta D; Eisenschenk A; Ernst A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 15886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiological outcome of the pull-back technique in cochlear implantees.
    Basta D; Todt I; Ernst A
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Jul; 120(7):1391-6. PubMed ID: 20564720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological effects of electrode pull-back in cochlear implant surgery.
    Todt I; Basta D; Seidl R; Ernst A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008; 128(12):1314-21. PubMed ID: 18607948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study.
    van Weert S; Stokroos RJ; Rikers MM; van Dijk P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):725-31. PubMed ID: 16012034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Coordes A; Ernst A; Brademann G; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1027-32. PubMed ID: 23507991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear structures after implantation of a perimodiolar electrode array.
    Richter B; Jaekel K; Aschendorff A; Marangos N; Laszig R
    Laryngoscope; 2001 May; 111(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 11359162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.
    Paasche G; Tasche C; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19546829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.
    Mittmann P; Todt I; Ernst A; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Göricke S; Schlamann M; Ramalingam R; Lang S; Christov F; Arweiler-Harbeck D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4251-4256. PubMed ID: 27351885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.