270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15886630)
1. The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.
Todt I; Basta D; Eisenschenk A; Ernst A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 15886630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Audiological outcome of the pull-back technique in cochlear implantees.
Basta D; Todt I; Ernst A
Laryngoscope; 2010 Jul; 120(7):1391-6. PubMed ID: 20564720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrophysiological effects of electrode pull-back in cochlear implant surgery.
Todt I; Basta D; Seidl R; Ernst A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008; 128(12):1314-21. PubMed ID: 18607948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study.
van Weert S; Stokroos RJ; Rikers MM; van Dijk P
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):725-31. PubMed ID: 16012034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
Coordes A; Ernst A; Brademann G; Todt I
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1027-32. PubMed ID: 23507991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear structures after implantation of a perimodiolar electrode array.
Richter B; Jaekel K; Aschendorff A; Marangos N; Laszig R
Laryngoscope; 2001 May; 111(5):837-43. PubMed ID: 11359162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.
Paasche G; Tasche C; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19546829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study.
Mittmann P; Todt I; Ernst A; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Göricke S; Schlamann M; Ramalingam R; Lang S; Christov F; Arweiler-Harbeck D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 273(12):4251-4256. PubMed ID: 27351885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
