BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15887724)

  • 1. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and 5-fluorouracil augmented endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. A retrospective review.
    Watts P; Ram AR; Nair R; Williams H
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 49(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 15887724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Hartikainen J; Grenman R; Puukka P; Seppä H
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Jun; 105(6):1106-13. PubMed ID: 9627664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy outcome profile in a general ophthalmic service unit: a comparative retrospective study.
    Ibrahim HA; Batterbury M; Banhegyi G; McGalliard J
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2001; 32(3):220-7. PubMed ID: 11371089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A consideration of the time taken to do dacryo-cystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery.
    Malhotra R; Wright M; Olver JM
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):691-6. PubMed ID: 12928678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes).
    Cokkeser Y; Evereklioglu C; Er H
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Oct; 123(4):488-91. PubMed ID: 11020191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Holmium: YAG and neodymium: YAG laser assisted trans-canalicular dacryocystorhinostomy. Results of 317 first procedures].
    Piaton JM; Keller P; Limon S; Quenot S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 11285440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR)].
    Bambule G; Chamero J
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2001 Oct; 121(10):747-51. PubMed ID: 11715292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcanalicular laser-assisted revision of failed dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Woo KI; Moon SH; Kim YD
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 1998 Jun; 29(6):451-5. PubMed ID: 9640564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Metson R; Woog JJ; Puliafito CA
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Mar; 104(3 Pt 1):269-74. PubMed ID: 8127181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term follow-up of patients with microscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Dietrich C; Mewes T; Kühnemund M; Hashemi B; Mann WJ; Amedee RG
    Am J Rhinol; 2003; 17(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 12693657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic terminal dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Sham CL; van Hasselt CA
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Jun; 110(6):1045-9. PubMed ID: 10852528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Value of external dacryocystorhinostomy].
    Struck HG
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Jul; 215(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10448630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: technique and results].
    McMasters M; Messerli J; Wolfensberger M
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2000; 116():74S-76S. PubMed ID: 10780078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The treatment of punctal and canalicular stenosis in patients on systemic 5-FU.
    Fezza JP; Wesley RE; Klippenstein KA
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 1999 Feb; 30(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 10037204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [External dacryocystorhinostomy with mitomycin C. Clinical and anatomical evaluation with helical computed tomography].
    Gonzalvo Ibáñez FJ ; Fuertes Fernández I ; Fernández Tirado FJ ; Hernández Delgado G ; Rabinal Arbués F ; Honrubia López FM
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Sep; 75(9):611-7. PubMed ID: 11151233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.
    Wormald PJ
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Jan; 112(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 11802041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Revision of failed dacryocystorhinostomies using the transcanalicular approach. Results of 118 procedures].
    Piaton JM; Keller P; Limon S; Quenot S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 11285441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flaps: comparison of petroleum jelly gauze nasal packing with gelatin sponge nasal packing.
    Mauriello JA; Vadehra VK
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 1996 Jul; 27(7):605-11. PubMed ID: 9240778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [First line endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy Technique and results. Comparison between diode laser and electrocautery instrument. Study based on 422 procedures].
    Piaton JM; Keller P; Limon S; Quenot S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2002 Feb; 25(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 11941234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and 5-fluorouracil augmented endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. A retrospective review.
    Dhage SS
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Mar; 50(1):69; author reply 69-70. PubMed ID: 12090095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.