399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15889215)
1. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
Di Carlo I; Barbagallo F; Toro A; Sofia M; Lombardo R; Cordio S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications.
Karanlik H; Kurul S
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep; 100(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 19582820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External jugular vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in cancer patients: A potentially useful alternative.
Povoski SP
World J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 2():7. PubMed ID: 15090065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein
Iorio O; Gazzanelli S; D'Ermo G; Pezzolla A; Gurrado A; Testini M; De Toma G; Cavallaro G
Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29981612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.
Jablon LK; Ugolini KR; Nahmias NC
Am J Surg; 2006 Jul; 192(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16769277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.
Araújo C; Silva JP; Antunes P; Fernandes JM; Dias C; Pereira H; Dias T; Fougo JL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel "shrug technique" for totally implantable venous access devices via the external jugular vein: A consecutive series of 254 patients.
Kagawa T; Ueyama S; Kobayashi T; Okabayashi H; Kuroda S; Fujiwara T
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(3):291-295. PubMed ID: 27813159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Totally implantable venous access ports by cephalic vein cut-down for patients receiving chemotherapy].
Ayadi S; Ksantini R; Maghrebi H; Daghfous A; Ayadi M; Fteriche F; Bedioui H; Chebbi F; Amous A; Jouini M; Kacem M; Mezlini A; Ben Safta Z
Tunis Med; 2011; 89(8-9):699-702. PubMed ID: 21948685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conversion from cephalic vein to external jugular vein: success rate increased on totally implantable access ports with cut-down method.
Lin CH; Yu JC; Lee YT; Wu HS
Surg Innov; 2013 Dec; 20(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 23445713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G; Caramitti A; Aurello P; Lauro S; Bordin F; Della Casa U
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalic vein cutdown for inserting indwelling subclavian vein catheters in gynecologic oncology patients.
Kamat A; Kramer P; Soisson AP
W V Med J; 2002; 98(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11941896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External jugular vein approach for TIVAD implantation: first choice or only an alternative? A review of the literature.
Iorio O; Cavallaro G
J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 25198827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Open insertion of right atrial catheters through the jugular veins.
Raaf JH; Heil D
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Sep; 177(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 8395086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Assessment of patient's comfort and functioning of a totally implantable venous system placed in the safenous vein].
Toro A; Sofia M; Sparatore F; Lombardo R; Cordio S; Di Carlo I
G Chir; 2005; 26(6-7):282-5. PubMed ID: 16332308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of a totally implantable access port through the external jugular vein when the cephalic vein approach is not feasible.
Lin YC; Chu CH; Ou KW; Chan DC; Hsieh CB; Chen TW; Hsu HM; Yu JC
Ann Vasc Surg; 2011 Feb; 25(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 20926248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomised study of cephalic vein cut-down versus subclavian vein puncture technique in the implantation of subcutaneous venous access devices.
D'Angelo FA; Ramacciato G; Aurello P; De Angelis R; Amodio P; Magrì M; Barillari P
Chir Ital; 2002; 54(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 12239758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases.
Chang HM; Hsieh CB; Hsieh HF; Chen TW; Chen CJ; Chan DC; Yu JC; Liu YC; Shen KL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Feb; 32(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 16289481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
Hoareau-Gruchet F; Rtail R; Sulaj H; Khirnetkina A; Reyt E; Righini CA
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
Chen PT; Sung CS; Wang CC; Chan KH; Chang WK; Hsu WH
J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A modified internal jugular vein access for long-term catheter placement in cancer patients.
Pires e Albuquerque M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):937-41. PubMed ID: 17103072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
