These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15889544)

  • 1. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.
    Madabhushi A; Udupa JK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Method to correct intensity inhomogeneity in MR images for atherosclerosis characterization.
    Salvado O; Hillenbrand C; Zhang S; Wilson DL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):539-52. PubMed ID: 16689259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing MR image intensity standardization against tissue characterizability of magnetization transfer ratio imaging.
    Madabhushi A; Udupa JK; Moonis G
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 16878312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI.
    Madabhushi A; Feldman MD; Metaxas DN; Tomaszeweski J; Chute D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1611-25. PubMed ID: 16350920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normalized mutual information based registration using k-means clustering and shading correction.
    Knops ZF; Maintz JB; Viergever MA; Pluim JP
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Jun; 10(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 16111913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity inhomogeneity correction of multispectral MR images.
    Vovk U; Pernus F; Likar B
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16647862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison and validation of tissue modelization and statistical classification methods in T1-weighted MR brain images.
    Cuadra MB; Cammoun L; Butz T; Cuisenaire O; Thiran JP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1548-65. PubMed ID: 16350916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias artifact suppression on MR volumes.
    Ardizzone E; Pirrone R; Gambino O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):35-53. PubMed ID: 18644657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Field inhomogeneity correction based on gridding reconstruction for magnetic resonance imaging.
    Eggers H; Knopp T; Potts D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Mar; 26(3):374-84. PubMed ID: 17354642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The fast automatic algorithm for correction of MR bias field.
    Milchenko MV; Pianykh OS; Tyler JM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Oct; 24(4):891-900. PubMed ID: 16929550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intensity non-uniformity correction in MRI: existing methods and their validation.
    Belaroussi B; Milles J; Carme S; Zhu YM; Benoit-Cattin H
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Apr; 10(2):234-46. PubMed ID: 16307900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels.
    Manjón JV; Coupé P; Martí-Bonmatí L; Collins DL; Robles M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 20027588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction of bias field in MR images using singularity function analysis.
    Luo J; Zhu Y; Clarysse P; Magnin I
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Aug; 24(8):1067-85. PubMed ID: 16092338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI.
    Vovk U; Pernus F; Likar B
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Mar; 26(3):405-21. PubMed ID: 17354645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimized homomorphic unsharp masking for MR grayscale inhomogeneity correction.
    Brinkmann BH; Manduca A; Robb RA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Apr; 17(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9688149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated phase correction via maximization of the real signal.
    Hardy EH; Hoferer J; Mertens D; Kasper G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 27(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 18760554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computation of transmitted and received B1 fields in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Milles J; Zhu YM; Chen NK; Panych LP; Gimenez G; Guttmann CR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):885-95. PubMed ID: 16686411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unifying framework for multimodal brain MRI segmentation based on Hidden Markov Chains.
    Bricq S; Collet Ch; Armspach JP
    Med Image Anal; 2008 Dec; 12(6):639-52. PubMed ID: 18440268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phase unwrapping of MR images using Phi UN--a fast and robust region growing algorithm.
    Witoszynskyj S; Rauscher A; Reichenbach JR; Barth M
    Med Image Anal; 2009 Apr; 13(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 19070532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 56.