BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15889544)

  • 1. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.
    Madabhushi A; Udupa JK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Method to correct intensity inhomogeneity in MR images for atherosclerosis characterization.
    Salvado O; Hillenbrand C; Zhang S; Wilson DL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 May; 25(5):539-52. PubMed ID: 16689259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing MR image intensity standardization against tissue characterizability of magnetization transfer ratio imaging.
    Madabhushi A; Udupa JK; Moonis G
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 16878312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI.
    Madabhushi A; Feldman MD; Metaxas DN; Tomaszeweski J; Chute D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1611-25. PubMed ID: 16350920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normalized mutual information based registration using k-means clustering and shading correction.
    Knops ZF; Maintz JB; Viergever MA; Pluim JP
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Jun; 10(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 16111913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity inhomogeneity correction of multispectral MR images.
    Vovk U; Pernus F; Likar B
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16647862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison and validation of tissue modelization and statistical classification methods in T1-weighted MR brain images.
    Cuadra MB; Cammoun L; Butz T; Cuisenaire O; Thiran JP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Dec; 24(12):1548-65. PubMed ID: 16350916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bias artifact suppression on MR volumes.
    Ardizzone E; Pirrone R; Gambino O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):35-53. PubMed ID: 18644657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Field inhomogeneity correction based on gridding reconstruction for magnetic resonance imaging.
    Eggers H; Knopp T; Potts D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Mar; 26(3):374-84. PubMed ID: 17354642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The fast automatic algorithm for correction of MR bias field.
    Milchenko MV; Pianykh OS; Tyler JM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Oct; 24(4):891-900. PubMed ID: 16929550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intensity non-uniformity correction in MRI: existing methods and their validation.
    Belaroussi B; Milles J; Carme S; Zhu YM; Benoit-Cattin H
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Apr; 10(2):234-46. PubMed ID: 16307900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels.
    Manjón JV; Coupé P; Martí-Bonmatí L; Collins DL; Robles M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):192-203. PubMed ID: 20027588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction of bias field in MR images using singularity function analysis.
    Luo J; Zhu Y; Clarysse P; Magnin I
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Aug; 24(8):1067-85. PubMed ID: 16092338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI.
    Vovk U; Pernus F; Likar B
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Mar; 26(3):405-21. PubMed ID: 17354645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimized homomorphic unsharp masking for MR grayscale inhomogeneity correction.
    Brinkmann BH; Manduca A; Robb RA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Apr; 17(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9688149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated phase correction via maximization of the real signal.
    Hardy EH; Hoferer J; Mertens D; Kasper G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 27(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 18760554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computation of transmitted and received B1 fields in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Milles J; Zhu YM; Chen NK; Panych LP; Gimenez G; Guttmann CR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):885-95. PubMed ID: 16686411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unifying framework for multimodal brain MRI segmentation based on Hidden Markov Chains.
    Bricq S; Collet Ch; Armspach JP
    Med Image Anal; 2008 Dec; 12(6):639-52. PubMed ID: 18440268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
    Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phase unwrapping of MR images using Phi UN--a fast and robust region growing algorithm.
    Witoszynskyj S; Rauscher A; Reichenbach JR; Barth M
    Med Image Anal; 2009 Apr; 13(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 19070532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 78.