1302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15889656)
1. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].
Cune MS; van Kampen FM; van der Bilt A
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2006 Oct; 113(10):401-7. PubMed ID: 17058761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments.
Cune M; Burgers M; van Kampen F; de Putter C; van der Bilt A
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 20617218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types.
van der Bilt A; van Kampen FM; Cune MS
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Jun; 114(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
Walton JN
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients.
Rismanchian M; Bajoghli F; Mostajeran Z; Fazel A; Eshkevari Ps
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 19813425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG.
Uçankale M; Akoğlu B; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK
Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Närhi TO; Geertman ME; Hevinga M; Abdo H; Kalk W
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10898841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
