138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15890424)
21. Personalized assessment of kV cone beam computed tomography doses in image-guided radiotherapy of pediatric cancer patients.
Zhang Y; Yan Y; Nath R; Bao S; Deng J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22285667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reducing CT radiation dose with iterative reconstruction algorithms: the influence of scan and reconstruction parameters on image quality and CTDIvol.
Klink T; Obmann V; Heverhagen J; Stork A; Adam G; Begemann P
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 83(9):1645-54. PubMed ID: 25037931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An image quality comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems.
Kamath S; Song W; Chvetsov A; Ozawa S; Lu H; Samant S; Liu C; Li JG; Palta JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 12(2):3435. PubMed ID: 21587192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dual-beam imaging for online verification of radiotherapy field placement.
Jaffray DA; Chawla K; Yu C; Wong JW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 7493852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT.
Walter C; Boda-Heggemann J; Wertz H; Loeb I; Rahn A; Lohr F; Wenz F
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 18023491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients.
Létourneau D; Martinez AA; Lockman D; Yan D; Vargas C; Ivaldi G; Wong J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1239-46. PubMed ID: 15913917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Correction of patient positioning errors based on in-line cone beam CTs: clinical implementation and first experiences.
Thilmann C; Nill S; Tücking T; Höss A; Hesse B; Dietrich L; Bendl R; Rhein B; Häring P; Thieke C; Oelfke U; Debus J; Huber P
Radiat Oncol; 2006 May; 1():16. PubMed ID: 16723023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comprehensive evaluation of angular range and separation on image quality, image registration, and imaging dose for cone beam computed tomography in radiotherapy.
Men K; Dai J
Med Dosim; 2019 Spring; 44(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 29573923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dosimetry of an in-line kilovoltage imaging system and implementation in treatment planning.
Dzierma Y; Nuesken F; Otto W; Alaei P; Licht N; Rübe C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(4):913-9. PubMed ID: 24456996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Wong W; Lam N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quality assurance of onboard megavoltage computed tomography imaging and target localization systems for on- and off-line image-guided radiotherapy.
Langen KM; Meeks SL; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008; 71(1 Suppl):S62-5. PubMed ID: 18406940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of bowtie filtration on cone-beam CT image quality.
Mail N; Moseley DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 19235370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical implementation of prostate image guided radiation therapy: a prospective study to define the optimal field of interest and image registration technique using automated x-ray volumetric imaging software.
Moran MS; Lund MW; Ahmad M; Moseley D; Waldron K; Gregory J; Friedman FP; Wilson LD
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jun; 7(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 18473493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography using a high-efficiency image receptor.
Seppi EJ; Munro P; Johnsen SW; Shapiro EG; Tognina C; Jones D; Pavkovich JM; Webb C; Mollov I; Partain LD; Colbeth RE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Mar; 55(3):793-803. PubMed ID: 12573767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optical molecular imaging-guided radiation therapy part 1: Integrated x-ray and bioluminescence tomography.
Shi J; Udayakumar TS; Wang Z; Dogan N; Pollack A; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4786-4794. PubMed ID: 28627007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetric intercomparison for multicenter clinical trials using a patient-based anatomic pelvic phantom.
Ebert MA; Harrison KM; Howlett SJ; Cornes D; Bulsara M; Hamilton CS; Kron T; Joseph DJ; Denham JW
Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5167-75. PubMed ID: 21978061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Image quality improvement for medium and large field of view Elekta XVI scans.
Little DP
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Dec; 42(4):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 31728940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Impact of Parameter Selection and Setup Conditions on Image Quality of an On-Board Helical Kilovoltage Computed Tomography System.
Tegtmeier RC; Ferris WS; Bayouth JE; Culberson WS
Cureus; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e29244. PubMed ID: 36277579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Technical Note: Radiological properties of tissue surrogates used in a multimodality deformable pelvic phantom for MR-guided radiotherapy.
Niebuhr NI; Johnen W; Güldaglar T; Runz A; Echner G; Mann P; Möhler C; Pfaffenberger A; Jäkel O; Greilich S
Med Phys; 2016 Feb; 43(2):908-16. PubMed ID: 26843251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study.
Sakai Y; Monzen H; Takei Y; Kosaka H; Nakamura K; Yanagi Y; Wakabayashi K; Hosono M; Nishimura Y
J Med Phys; 2023; 48(2):189-194. PubMed ID: 37576099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
