BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15890487)

  • 1. Uncemented short-length diaphyseal segmental replacement prosthesis fixation--finite element analysis and long-term results.
    Werner CM; Jacob HA; Ramseier LE; Favre P; Exner GU
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Sep; 23(5):1065-72. PubMed ID: 15890487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The endlock tumor prosthesis with short-length fixation: a clinical study.
    Ramseier LE; Werner CM; Jacob HA; Exner GU
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2010 Aug; 39(8):386-91. PubMed ID: 20882204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Alloplastic bone replacement in resection defects of the long bones].
    Lembcke O; Brutscher R; Rüter A
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1996; 134(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 8967145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cementless fixation for primary segmental bone tumor endoprostheses.
    Blunn GW; Briggs TW; Cannon SR; Walker PS; Unwin PS; Culligan S; Cobb JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Mar; (372):223-30. PubMed ID: 10738431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of 2 proximally coated femoral stems: effects of stem length and surface finish.
    Ong KL; Day JS; Manley MT; Kurtz SM; Geesink R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 18977636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Intercalary Prosthesis for Humeral Diaphyseal Segmental Defect Reconstruction.
    Zhao LM; Tian DM; Wei Y; Zhang JH; Di ZL; He ZY; Hu YC
    Orthop Surg; 2018 Feb; 10(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 29484857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis--a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Westphal FM; Bishop N; Honl M; Hille E; Püschel K; Morlock MM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):834-40. PubMed ID: 16806616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study on design method for the individual anatomical hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Gong X; Kang L; Wang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 25(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 18435265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stress shielding and bone resorption in THA: clinical versus computer-simulation studies.
    Huiskes R
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():118-29. PubMed ID: 8116386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessments of different kinds of stems by experiments and FEM analysis: appropriate stress distribution on a hip prosthesis.
    Sakai R; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):826-33. PubMed ID: 16701927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement: repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation.
    Digas G; Kärrholm J; Thanner J
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 16752282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Intercalary reconstruction for diaphyseal bone defects with a modular replacement system: Clinical results].
    Friedrich MJ; Schmolders J; Lob G; Randau TM; Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Pennekamp PH
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2015 Oct; 27(5):455-62. PubMed ID: 25779874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A composite fixation principle for modular segmental defect replacement (SDR) prostheses.
    Chao EY
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1989 Jul; 20(3):439-53. PubMed ID: 2740104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Custom cross-pin fixation of 32 tumor endoprostheses stems.
    Cannon CP; Eckardt JJ; Kabo JM; Ward WG; Kelly CM; Wirganowicz PZ; Asavamongkolkul A; Nieves R; Eilber FR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Dec; (417):285-92. PubMed ID: 14646728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.