186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15891155)
1. Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Berg M; Zhang Z; Ikonen A; Sipola P; Kälviäinen R; Manninen H; Vanninen R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2005 May; 26(5):1022-34. PubMed ID: 15891155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maximum stenosis of extracranial internal carotid artery: effect of luminal morphology on stenosis measurement by using CT angiography and conventional DSA.
Hirai T; Korogi Y; Ono K; Murata Y; Takahashi M; Suginohara K; Uemura S
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):802-9. PubMed ID: 11719682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography.
Catalano C; Fraioli F; Laghi A; Napoli A; Bezzi M; Pediconi F; Danti M; Nofroni I; Passariello R
Radiology; 2004 May; 231(2):555-63. PubMed ID: 15128997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Willmann JK; Baumert B; Schertler T; Wildermuth S; Pfammatter T; Verdun FR; Seifert B; Marincek B; Böhm T
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):1083-93. PubMed ID: 16055691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Castellano R; Strada L; Righi C; Politi LS; Kirchin MA; Chiesa R; Scotti G
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal carotid artery stenosis measurement: comparison of 3D computed rotational angiography and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Hyde DE; Fox AJ; Gulka I; Kalapos P; Lee DH; Pelz DM; Holdsworth DW
Stroke; 2004 Dec; 35(12):2776-81. PubMed ID: 15514196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intravenous flat-detector computed tomography angiography for high-grade carotid stenosis.
Jeon JS; Sheen SH; Kim HC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):242-6. PubMed ID: 23493213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography.
Cumming MJ; Morrow IM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):517-23. PubMed ID: 8079836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis.
Link J; Brossmann J; Grabener M; Mueller-Huelsbeck S; Steffens JC; Brinkmann G; Heller M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 8770255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maximum internal carotid arterial stenosis: assessment with rotational angiography versus conventional intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Buijs PC; Wüst AF; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):777-83. PubMed ID: 10580953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carotid artery stenosis: reproducibility of automated 3D CT angiography analysis method.
Zhang Z; Berg MH; Ikonen AE; Vanninen RL; Manninen HI
Eur Radiol; 2004 Apr; 14(4):665-72. PubMed ID: 14618367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences between MIP and MPR techniques in the carotid artery stenosis degree measurement. Evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiograph.
Saba L; Mallarini G
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Feb; 56(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 18432165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carotid bifurcation CT angiography: assessment of interactive volume rendering.
Verhoek G; Costello P; Khoo EW; Wu R; Kat E; Fitridge RA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(4):590-6. PubMed ID: 10433292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Common carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary results of CT angiography and color-coded duplex sonography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Link J; Brossmann J; Penselin V; Glüer CC; Heller M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):361-5. PubMed ID: 9016207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Mannil M; Ramachandran J; Vittoria de Martini I; Wegener S; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Krauss B; Valavanis A; Alkadhi H; Winklhofer S
Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
