These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15891787)

  • 1. Mechanical properties of three different commercially available miniscrews for skeletal anchorage.
    Carano A; Lonardo P; Velo S; Incorvati C
    Prog Orthod; 2005; 6(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 15891787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical properties evaluation of an orthodontic miniscrew system for skeletal anchorage.
    Francioli D; Ruggiero G; Giorgetti R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 20974446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of screw diameter on orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Morarend C; Qian F; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Grosland NM; Morgan TA; McManus M; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 19651352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical applications of the Mini-Screw-Anchorage-System (M.A.S.) in the maxillary alveolar bone.
    Carano A; Velo S; Incorvati C; Poggio P
    Prog Orthod; 2004; 5(2):212-35. PubMed ID: 15546013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical loading of orthodontic miniscrews - significance and problems: an experimental study.
    Reicheneder C; Rottner K; Bokan I; Mai R; Lauer G; Richter G; Gedrange T; Proff P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Oct; 53(5):242-5. PubMed ID: 18840065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length.
    Lim SA; Cha JY; Hwang CJ
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 18251617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of thread shape on the pullout strength of miniscrews.
    Gracco A; Giagnorio C; Incerti Parenti S; Alessandri Bonetti G; Siciliani G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 22858327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the loading behavior of self-drilling and predrilled miniscrews throughout orthodontic loading.
    Wang YC; Liou EJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18174069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of insertion torque and mechanical stability for self-tapping and self-drilling orthodontic miniscrews - an in vitro study.
    Tepedino M; Masedu F; Chimenti C
    Head Face Med; 2017 May; 13(1):10. PubMed ID: 28558821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of miniscrew taper morphology on insertion and removal torque in dogs.
    Cha JY; Takano-Yamamoto T; Hwang CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):777-83. PubMed ID: 20657874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of anchorage systems for micro implant orthodontics.
    Favero L; Giagnorio C; Cocilovo F
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):105-17. PubMed ID: 20974447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in stress distribution of orthodontic miniscrews and surrounding bone evaluated by 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Suzuki A; Masuda T; Takahashi I; Deguchi T; Suzuki O; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e273-80. PubMed ID: 22133961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of four different miniscrew types for skeletal anchorage in the mandibulo-maxillary area.
    Mischkowski RA; Kneuertz P; Florvaag B; Lazar F; Koebke J; Zöller JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 37(10):948-54. PubMed ID: 18774694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the osseous/metal interface of drill free screws and self-tapping screws.
    Heidemann W; Terheyden H; Gerlach KL
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 29(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11465436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the taper shape, dual-thread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Kim YK; Kim YJ; Yun PY; Kim JW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):908-14. PubMed ID: 19705930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort.
    Kuroda S; Sugawara Y; Deguchi T; Kyung HM; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17208101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Torsional properties and microstructures of miniscrew implants.
    Iijima M; Muguruma T; Brantley WA; Okayama M; Yuasa T; Mizoguchi I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):333.e1-6; discussion 333-4. PubMed ID: 18774076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review.
    Papadopoulos MA; Tarawneh F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):e6-15. PubMed ID: 17317235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical properties of orthodontic miniscrews. An in-vitro study.
    Florvaag B; Kneuertz P; Lazar F; Koebke J; Zöller JE; Braumann B; Mischkowski RA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Jan; 71(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 20135250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.