260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15893269)
1. Impact of selection of post-implant technique on dosimetry parameters for permanent prostate implants.
Haworth A; Ebert M; St Clair S; Carey BM; Flynn A; Bottomley DM; Duchesne GM; Joseph D; Ash D
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 15893269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of interobserver variability on transrectal ultrasonography-based postimplant dosimetry.
Xue J; Waterman F; Handler J; Gressen E
Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 16864069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of transrectal ultrasound- and computed tomography-based seed localization on postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy.
Chew MS; Xue J; Houser C; Misic V; Cao J; Cornwell T; Handler J; Yu Y; Gressen E
Brachytherapy; 2009; 8(2):255-264. PubMed ID: 19213606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Poor predictive value of intraoperative real-time dosimetry for prostate seed brachytherapy.
Igidbashian L; Donath D; Carrier JF; Lassalle S; Hervieux Y; David S; Bahary JP; Taussky D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):605-9. PubMed ID: 18793964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver variability of 3.0-tesla and 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography fusion image-based post-implant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy.
Watanabe K; Katayama N; Katsui K; Matsushita T; Takamoto A; Ihara H; Nasu Y; Takemoto M; Kuroda M; Kanazawa S
J Radiat Res; 2019 Jul; 60(4):483-489. PubMed ID: 31083713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intraoperative dosimetric implant representation with postimplant dosimetry in patients receiving prostate brachytherapy.
Stone NN; Hong S; Lo YC; Howard V; Stock RG
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 15062159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?
D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Difference in rectal dosimetry between pre-plan and post-implant analysis in transperineal interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
Ishiyama H; Kitano M; Satoh T; Niibe Y; Uemae M; Fujita T; Baba S; Hayakawa K
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Feb; 78(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 16414135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI-CT fusion to assess postbrachytherapy prostate volume and the effects of prolonged edema on dosimetry following transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Crook J; McLean M; Yeung I; Williams T; Lockwood G
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 15374536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Live implant dosimetry may be an effective replacement for postimplant computed tomography in localized prostate cancer patients receiving low dose rate brachytherapy.
Roshan D; Joyce K; Woulfe P; Gorakati PR; Stock R; Sullivan FJ
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(4):873-882. PubMed ID: 33840634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.
Mangili P; Stea L; Cattani F; Lappi S; Giglioli F; Calamia E; Ziglio F; Martinelli R; Longobardi B
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15066291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between pre- and postimplant dosimetry for iodine-125 seed implants for localized prostate cancer.
Al-Qaisieh B; Witteveen T; Carey B; Henry A; Bottomley D; Smith J; Franks K; Bownes P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):626-30. PubMed ID: 19540077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning.
Yan C; Huq MS; Heron DE; Beriwal S; Wynn RB
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Ali I; Algan O; Thompson S; Sindhwani P; Herman T; Cheng CY; Ahmad S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of edema associated with 131Cs prostate permanent seed implants on dosimetric quality indices.
Kehwar TS; Jones HA; Huq MS; Beriwal S; Benoit RM; Smith RP
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3536-42. PubMed ID: 19746787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of post-plan dosimetry using TRUS and CT after transperineal prostate seed implant.
Helmick R; Tarver R; Chan R; Caldwell S
Med Dosim; 2002; 27(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 12521076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between postoperative TRUS-CT fusion with MRI-CT fusion for postimplant quality assurance in prostate LDR permanent seed brachytherapy.
Tisseverasinghe S; Marbán M; Crook J; Petrik D; Araujo C
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(4):849-856. PubMed ID: 33867295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
