BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

915 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15893812)

  • 1. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
    Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
    Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
    Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
    J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
    Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
    Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
    Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
    Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
    Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Holmium:YAG Lasertripsy with semirigid ureterorenoscope for upper-ureteral stones >2 cm.
    Chen CS; Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY
    J Endourol; 2005 Sep; 19(7):780-4. PubMed ID: 16190827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
    Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic management of impacted ureteral stones using a small caliber ureteroscope and a laser lithotriptor.
    Mugiya S; Nagata M; Un-No T; Takayama T; Suzuki K; Fujita K
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):329-31. PubMed ID: 10893577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy as emergency treatment for acute renal failure caused by impacted ureteral calculi.
    Jiang H; Wu Z; Ding Q
    Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):504-7. PubMed ID: 18653216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical experience with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy of ureteral calculi.
    Yiu MK; Liu PL; Yiu TF; Chan AY
    Lasers Surg Med; 1996; 19(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 8837001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
    Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ten-year experience in the management of distal ureteral stones greater than 10 mm in size.
    Dell'Atti L; Papa S
    G Chir; 2016; 37(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 27142822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
    Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.
    Grasso M; Conlin M; Bagley D
    J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 9679874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinary tract calculi: II. Cost and outcome assessment of 112 primary ureteral calculi.
    Grasso M; Beaghler M; Loisides P
    Urology; 1995 Mar; 45(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 7879330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of holmium:YAG laser with Lithoclast lithotripsy in ureteral calculi fragmentation.
    Jeon SS; Hyun JH; Lee KS
    Int J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):544-7. PubMed ID: 15985075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrograde endoscopic management of ureteral stones more than 2 cm in size.
    Mugiya S; Ozono S; Nagata M; Takayama T; Nagae H
    Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1164-8; discussion 1168. PubMed ID: 16765171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Compare the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with ureteroscopic management after failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
    Wang DW; Wang JY; Cao XM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 19570385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
    Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
    Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.