These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15893861)

  • 1. Workshop to extend the involvement of stakeholders in decisions on restoration management.
    Nisbet A; Howard B; Beresford N; Voigt G
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):259-61. PubMed ID: 15893861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Achievements, difficulties and future challenges for the FARMING network.
    Nisbet AF; Mercer JA; Rantavaara A; Hanninen R; Vandecasteele C; Carlé B; Hardeman F; Ioannides KG; Papachristodoulou C; Tzialla C; Ollagnon H; Jullien T; Pupin V
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):263-74. PubMed ID: 15951072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The STRATEGY project: decision tools to aid sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated agricultural ecosystems.
    Howard BJ; Beresford NA; Nisbet A; Cox G; Oughton DH; Hunt J; Alvarez B; Andersson KG; Liland A; Voigt G
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):275-95. PubMed ID: 15905001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitude of a group of Belgian stakeholders towards proposed agricultural countermeasures after a radioactive contamination: synthesis of the discussions within the Belgian EC-FARMING group.
    Vandecasteele CM; Hardeman F; Pauwels O; Bernaerts M; Carlé B; Sombré L
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):319-32. PubMed ID: 15961199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The FARMING approach: main results and perspectives of the French FARMING groups.
    Jullien T; Reales N; Gallay F; Lepicard S
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):333-45. PubMed ID: 15922493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stakeholder involvement in nuclear crisis management in Greece.
    Ioannides KG; Tzialla CE; Papachristodoulou CA; Papanikolaou C; Apostolopoulos C
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 15961200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in stakeholder opinion on countermeasures across Europe.
    Nisbet AF; Mercer JA; Rantavaara A; Hanninen R; Vandecasteele C; Hardeman F; Ioannides KG; Tzialla C; Ollagnon H; Pupin V; Jullien T
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 15951071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Better use of European (regional) resources.
    Rojas-Palma C; Hardeman F; Miska H; Duranova T; Cabanekova H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):115-7. PubMed ID: 15238668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finnish stakeholder engagement in the restoration of a radioactively contaminated food supply chain.
    Rantavaara A; Wallin H; Hasunen K; Härmälä K; Kulmala H; Latvio E; Liskola K; Mustonen I; Nieminen I; Tainio R
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 15905000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overview of the wisdom stakeholder workshop on restoration management.
    Nisbet AF; Mercer JA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):101-4. PubMed ID: 15238665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stakeholder involvement facilitates decision making for UK nuclear accident recovery.
    Alexander C; Burt R; Nisbet AF
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 15921830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Summary and conclusions: capabilities and challenges.
    Kelly GN; Jones R; Crick MJ; Weiss W; Morrey M; Lochard J; French S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):155-64. PubMed ID: 15238677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A critical evaluation of the strategy project.
    Howard BJ; Liland A; Beresford NA; Andersson KG; Cox G; Gil JM; Hunt J; Nisbet A; Oughton DH; Voigt G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):63-7. PubMed ID: 15238658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ongoing efforts to improve the international nuclear and radiological emergency response.
    Ugletveit F; Molhoek W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):149-50. PubMed ID: 15238675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Costs and practicability of clean feeding of dairy cattle during radioactive contamination of grasslands.
    Rantavaara A; Karhula T; Puurunen M; Lampinen K; Taulavuori T
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):399-414. PubMed ID: 15922495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experiences in methods to involve key players in planning protective actions in the case of a nuclear accident.
    Sinkko K; Hämäläinen RP; Hänninen R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15238670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preparedness of households and catering establishments for incidents involving radioactive contamination.
    Enqvist H
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 83(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 15893860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information and interaction with the public.
    Grlicarev I; Stritar A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):41-4. PubMed ID: 15238654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emergency management: does it have a sufficiently comprehensive understanding of decision-making, process and context?
    Niculae C; French S; Carter E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):97-100. PubMed ID: 15238664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. International data- and information exchange for off-site emergency management--where to go?
    Höbler C; Hable K; Baig S; Zähringer M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(1-2):59-62. PubMed ID: 15238657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.