334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15894350)
41. Invertebrate mercury bioaccumulation in permanent, seasonal, and flooded rice wetlands within California's Central Valley.
Ackerman JT; Miles AK; Eagles-Smith CA
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Jan; 408(3):666-71. PubMed ID: 19880160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Methylmercury input to the Mississippi River from a large metropolitan wastewater treatment plant.
Balogh SJ; Nollet YH
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Nov; 406(1-2):145-53. PubMed ID: 18768210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Temporal changes in the distribution, methylation, and bioaccumulation of newly deposited mercury in an aquatic ecosystem.
Orihel DM; Paterson MJ; Blanchfield PJ; Bodaly RA; Gilmour CC; Hintelmann H
Environ Pollut; 2008 Jul; 154(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 18272273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Mercury exposure in the freshwater tilapia Oreochromis niloticus.
Wang R; Wong MH; Wang WX
Environ Pollut; 2010 Aug; 158(8):2694-701. PubMed ID: 20493602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Influence of physiochemical and watershed characteristics on mercury concentration in Walleye, Sander vitreus, M.
Hayer CA; Chipps SR; Stone JJ
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 Feb; 86(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 21152888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Climate induced thermocline change has an effect on the methyl mercury cycle in small boreal lakes.
Verta M; Salo S; Korhonen M; Porvari P; Paloheimo A; Munthe J
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Aug; 408(17):3639-47. PubMed ID: 20595057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Biomonitoring of mercury in polluted coastal area using transplanted mussels.
Kljaković-Gaspić Z; Odzak N; Ujević I; Zvonarić T; Horvat M; Barić A
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):199-209. PubMed ID: 16266737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Concentrations of methylmercury in invertebrates from wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America.
Bates LM; Hall BD
Environ Pollut; 2012 Jan; 160(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 22035939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Determination of mercury methylation potentials in the water column of lakes across Canada.
Eckley CS; Hintelmann H
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 16216310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Methylmercury and dissolved organic carbon relationships in a wetland-rich watershed impacted by elevated sulfate from mining.
Berndt ME; Bavin TK
Environ Pollut; 2012 Feb; 161():321-7. PubMed ID: 21705118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Watershed influences on mercury in tributaries to Lake Ontario.
Denkenberger JS; Fakhraei H; Branfireun B; Montesdeoca M; Driscoll CT
Ecotoxicology; 2020 Dec; 29(10):1614-1626. PubMed ID: 31925621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Mercury methylation and the microbial consortium in periphyton of tropical macrophytes: effect of different inhibitors.
Correia RR; Miranda MR; Guimarães JR
Environ Res; 2012 Jan; 112():86-91. PubMed ID: 22115392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Elevated mercury concentrations in fish in lakes in the Mackenzie River Basin: the role of physical, chemical, and biological factors.
Evans MS; Lockhart WL; Doetzel L; Low G; Muir D; Kidd K; Stephens G; Delaronde J
Sci Total Environ; 2005 Dec; 351-352():479-500. PubMed ID: 16183101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The impact of eutrophication on the biogeochemical cycling of mercury species in a reservoir: a case study from Hongfeng Reservoir, Guizhou, China.
He T; Feng X; Guo Y; Qiu G; Li Z; Liang L; Lu J
Environ Pollut; 2008 Jul; 154(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 18158204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Mercury, polybrominated diphenyl ether, organochlorine pesticide, and polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations in fish from lakes along an elevation transect in the French Pyrénées.
Blais JM; Charpentié S; Pick F; Kimpe LE; St Amand A; Regnault-Roger C
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2006 Jan; 63(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16253327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Mercury concentrations in landlocked Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) from the Canadian Arctic. Part I: insights from trophic relationships in 18 lakes.
Gantner N; Power M; Iqaluk D; Meili M; Borg H; Sundbom M; Solomon KR; Lawson G; Muir DC
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 Mar; 29(3):621-32. PubMed ID: 20821487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Mercury dynamics in groundwater across three distinct riparian zone types of the US Midwest.
Vidon PG; Mitchell CP; Jacinthe PA; Baker ME; Liu X; Fisher KR
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2013 Oct; 15(11):2131-41. PubMed ID: 24113840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Mercury distribution across 14 U.S. forests. Part II: Patterns of methyl mercury concentrations and areal mass of total and methyl mercury.
Obrist D
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jun; 46(11):5921-30. PubMed ID: 22519552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Biostrome communities and mercury and selenium bioaccumulation in the Great Salt Lake (Utah, USA).
Wurtsbaugh WA; Gardberg J; Izdepski C
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(20):4425-34. PubMed ID: 21835437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The burning question: does burning before flooding lower methyl mercury production and bioaccumulation?
Mailman M; Bodaly RA
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):407-17. PubMed ID: 16263153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
