These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15895628)

  • 1. Evidence for the correcting-mechanism explanation of the Kanizsa amodal shrinkage.
    Mitsudo H; Nakamizo S
    Perception; 2005; 34(3):289-303. PubMed ID: 15895628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shrinkage in the apparent size of cylindrical objects.
    Taya S; Miura K
    Perception; 2007; 36(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 17357702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual mechanisms underlying amodal surface integration of 3-D stereoscopic stimuli.
    He ZJ; Ooi TL; Su YR
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():66-81. PubMed ID: 29248730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kanizsa's shrinkage illusion produced by a misapplied 3-D corrective mechanism.
    González EG; Ono H; Lam E; Steinbach MJ
    Perception; 2005; 34(10):1181-92. PubMed ID: 16309113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How configurations of binocular disparity determine whether stereoscopic slant or stereoscopic occlusion is seen.
    Grove PM; Byrne JM; Barbara JG
    Perception; 2005; 34(9):1083-94. PubMed ID: 16245487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoscopic depth and the occlusion illusion.
    Palmer SE; Schloss KB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1083-94. PubMed ID: 19525539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid figure-ground responses to stereograms reveal an advantage for a convex foreground.
    Bertamini M; Lawson R
    Perception; 2008; 37(4):483-94. PubMed ID: 18546658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there an interaction between perceived direction and perceived aspect ratio in stereoscopic vision?
    van Ee R; Erkelens CJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):910-26. PubMed ID: 10997038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of occlusion cues in apparent motion.
    Ekroll V; Borzikowsky C
    Perception; 2010; 39(12):1606-23. PubMed ID: 21425700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Approximation, torsion, and amodally-completed surfaces.
    Fantoni C; Gerbino W; Kellman PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1196-216. PubMed ID: 18374963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of amodal completion in shape formation: some new shape phenomena.
    Pinna B
    Perception; 2012; 41(11):1336-54. PubMed ID: 23513620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A long-distance stereoscopic detector for partially occluding surfaces.
    Mitsudo H; Nakamizo S; Ono H
    Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1180-6. PubMed ID: 16249014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binocular displacement of unpaired region.
    Takeichi H; Nakazawa H
    Perception; 1994; 23(9):1025-36. PubMed ID: 7899044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Depth propagation and surface construction in 3-D vision.
    Georgeson MA; Yates TA; Schofield AJ
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 18977239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth.
    Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Vis; 2005 May; 5(5):417-34. PubMed ID: 16097873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amodal representation of occluded surfaces: role of invisible stimuli in apparent motion correspondence.
    Shimojo S; Nakayama K
    Perception; 1990; 19(3):285-99. PubMed ID: 2267141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetry between horizontal and vertical illusory lines in determining the depth of their embedded surface.
    Yazdanbakhsh A; Watanabe T
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(22):2621-7. PubMed ID: 15358077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binocular integration of partially occluded surfaces.
    Forte J; Peirce JW; Lennie P
    Vision Res; 2002 May; 42(10):1225-35. PubMed ID: 12044755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disparity biasing in depth from monocular occlusions.
    Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
    Vision Res; 2011 Jul; 51(14):1699-711. PubMed ID: 21651926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.