238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15896473)
1. Audiovisual prior entry.
Zampini M; Shore DI; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2005 Jun; 381(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15896473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 'Prior entry' for pain: attention speeds the perceptual processing of painful stimuli.
Zampini M; Bird KS; Bentley DE; Watson A; Barrett G; Jones AK; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 17197082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audiovisual synchrony perception for speech and music assessed using a temporal order judgment task.
Vatakis A; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 393(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 16213656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prior-entry: a review.
Spence C; Parise C
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):364-79. PubMed ID: 20056554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal order judgments for audiovisual targets embedded in unimodal and bimodal distractor streams.
Vatakis A; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 17010520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
Lange K; Röder B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
Koppen C; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exposure to asynchronous audiovisual speech extends the temporal window for audiovisual integration.
Navarra J; Vatakis A; Zampini M; Soto-Faraco S; Humphreys W; Spence C
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):499-507. PubMed ID: 16137867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
Koppen C; Spence C
Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attention rivalry under irrelevant audiovisual stimulation.
Feng T; Qiu Y; Zhu Y; Tong S
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 18482799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic crossmodal links revealed by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention.
de Jong R; Toffanin P; Harbers M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jan; 75(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 19819271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
Rodway P
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intermodal spatial attention differs between vision and audition: an event-related potential analysis.
Talsma D; Kok A
Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):689-706. PubMed ID: 12462498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
Fujisaki W; Nishida S
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
