346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15896506)
1. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP
Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound assessment of scald scars in Asian children receiving pressure garment therapy.
Cheng W; Saing H; Zhou H; Han Y; Peh W; Tam PK
J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Mar; 36(3):466-9. PubMed ID: 11226998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
Gankande TU; Wood FM; Edgar DW; Duke JM; DeJong HM; Henderson AE; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of changes of scar thickness under mechanical loading using ultrasonic measurement.
Li JQ; Li-Tsang CW; Huang YP; Chen Y; Zheng YP
Burns; 2013 Feb; 39(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 22763366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence of hypertrophic scar formation and its characteristics among the Chinese population.
Li-Tsang CW; Lau JC; Chan CC
Burns; 2005 Aug; 31(5):610-6. PubMed ID: 15993306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Sitch A; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen NS
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The recovery of post-burn hypertrophic scar in a monitored pressure therapy intervention programme and the timing of intervention.
Li P; Li-Tsang CWP; Deng X; Wang X; Wang H; Zhang Y; Tan Z; He C
Burns; 2018 Sep; 44(6):1451-1467. PubMed ID: 29887351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound is a reproducible and valid tool for measuring scar height in children with burn scars: A cross-sectional study of the psychometric properties and utility of the ultrasound and 3D camera.
Simons M; Kee EG; Kimble R; Tyack Z
Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28238405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between high-frequency ultrasonography and histological assessment reveals weak correlation for measurements of scar tissue thickness.
Agabalyan NA; Su S; Sinha S; Gabriel V
Burns; 2017 May; 43(3):531-538. PubMed ID: 28109548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Burns objective scar scale (BOSS): Validation of an objective measurement devices based burn scar scale panel.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen N
Burns; 2020 Feb; 46(1):110-120. PubMed ID: 31708256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 18388576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of an objective scar pigmentation measurement by using a spectrocolorimeter.
Li-Tsang CW; Lau JC; Liu SK
Burns; 2003 Dec; 29(8):779-84. PubMed ID: 14636751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Objective assessment of burn scar vascularity, erythema, pliability, thickness, and planimetry.
Oliveira GV; Chinkes D; Mitchell C; Oliveras G; Hawkins HK; Herndon DN
Dermatol Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 15720096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new CO2 laser technique for the treatment of pediatric hypertrophic burn scars: An observational study.
Żądkowski T; Nachulewicz P; Mazgaj M; Woźniak M; Cielecki C; Wieczorek AP; Beń-Skowronek I
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Oct; 95(42):e5168. PubMed ID: 27759650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Pressure therapy of hypertrophic scar after burns and related research].
Li-Tsang CW; Feng BB; Li KC
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 26(6):411-5. PubMed ID: 21223649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurements of scar properties by SkinFibroMeter
Seo SR; Kang NO; Yoon MS; Lee HJ; Kim DH
Skin Res Technol; 2017 Aug; 23(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 27796064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool.
Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring vascularity of hypertrophic scars by dermoscopy: Construct validity and predictive ability of scar thickness change.
Deng H; Li-Tsang CWP; Li J
Skin Res Technol; 2020 May; 26(3):369-375. PubMed ID: 31916320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Intra-rater reliability and validity of ultrasonography in the evaluation of hypertrophic scars caused by burns.
Lee SY; Cho YS; Kim L; Joo SY; Seo CH
Burns; 2023 Mar; 49(2):344-352. PubMed ID: 35459576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
