205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15896875)
1. Perceived naturalness and acceptance of genetically modified food.
Tenbült P; de Vries NK; Dreezens E; Martijn C
Appetite; 2005 Aug; 45(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 15896875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptance of genetically modified foods: the relation between technology and evaluation.
Tenbült P; De Vries NK; van Breukelen G; Dreezens E; Martijn C
Appetite; 2008 Jul; 51(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 18336952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China.
Huang J; Qiu H; Bai J; Pray C
Appetite; 2006 Mar; 46(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16469414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attitudes of agricultural scientists in Indonesia towards genetically modified foods.
Februhartanty J; Widyastuti TN; Iswarawanti DN
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2007; 16(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 17468097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods.
Saher M; Lindeman M; Hursti UK
Appetite; 2006 May; 46(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 16546293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk assessment of genetically modified crops for nutrition and health.
Magaña-Gómez JA; de la Barca AM
Nutr Rev; 2009 Jan; 67(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19146501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.
Siegrist M; Stampfli N; Kastenholz H; Keller C
Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 18406006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Nutrition and health--genetically modified food].
Kuiper HA; Kleter GA; Kok EJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Jan; 147(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 12602068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acceptance of GM food--an experiment in six countries.
Knight JG; Mather DW; Holdsworth DK; Ermen DF
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):507-8. PubMed ID: 17483829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Consumer perception of risk associated with eating genetically engineered soybeans is less in the presence of a perceived consumer benefit.
Brown JL; Ping Y
J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Feb; 103(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 12589328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
Lusk JL; Rozan A
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumer acceptance of ingenic foods.
Lusk JL; Rozan A
Biotechnol J; 2006 Dec; 1(12):1433-4. PubMed ID: 17124706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: lessons for the future of nutrigenomics.
Ronteltap A; van Trijp JC; Renes RJ; Frewer LJ
Appetite; 2007 Jul; 49(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 17382433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implicit attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) foods: a comparison of context-free and context-dependent evaluations.
Spence A; Townsend E
Appetite; 2006 Jan; 46(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16298018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unpacking atitudes towards genetically modified food.
de Liver Y; van der Pligt J; Wigboldus D
Appetite; 2005 Dec; 45(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 16154663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Divergent perspectives on GM food.
Avery A
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1196; author reply 1197. PubMed ID: 12454666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Divergent perspectives on GM food.
Beachy R; Bennetzen JL; Chassy BM; Chrispeels M; Chory J; Ecker JR; Noel JP; Kay SA; Dean C; Lamb C; Jones J; Santerre CR; Schroeder JI; Umen J; Yanofsky M; Wessler S; Zhao Y; Parrott W
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1195-6; author reply 1197. PubMed ID: 12454665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetically engineered animals in the food supply.
Burns K
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2008 Nov; 233(9):1370-3. PubMed ID: 18980485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative safety testing of genetically modified foods in a 90-day rat feeding study design allowing the distinction between primary and secondary effects of the new genetic event.
Knudsen I; Poulsen M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Oct; 49(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 17719159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
