These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15897282)

  • 1. Linear and logarithmic subtraction for detecting enamel subsurface demineralization.
    Haiter-Neto F; Ferreira RI; Tabchoury CP; Bóscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 15897282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography.
    Ferreira RI; Haiter-Neto F; Tabchoury CP; de Paiva GA; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 16878203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of a photostimulable storage phosphor digital system with or without the sharpen filter and cone beam CT for detecting approximal enamel subsurface demineralization.
    Belém MD; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120313. PubMed ID: 23412461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries.
    Belém MD; Ambrosano GM; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Haiter-Neto F
    Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 23739784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography.
    Halse A; Espelid I; Tveit AB; White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8139837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and reproducibility of conventional radiographic assessment and subtraction radiography in detecting demineralization in occlusal surfaces.
    Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR; Martignon S; Ellwood R; Alatsaris M; Nugent Z
    Caries Res; 2007; 41(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 17284913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital subtraction radiography for monitoring dental demineralization. An in vitro study.
    Eberhard J; Hartman B; Lenhard M; Mayer T; Kocher T; Eickholz P
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 10867420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic accuracy of proximal enamel subsurface demineralization and its relationship with calcium loss and lesion depth.
    Onem E; Baksi BG; Sen BH; Sögüt O; Mert A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 May; 41(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 22074868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro induction of enamel subsurface demineralization for evaluation of diagnostic imaging methods.
    Ferreira RI; Haiter-Neto F; Tabchoury CP; Bóscolo FN
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2007 Oct; 15(5):392-8. PubMed ID: 19089167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study.
    Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12076051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
    Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
    Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of proximal caries in conventional and digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
    Rockenbach MI; Veeck EB; da Costa NP
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 19223710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.