304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1589751)
21. Scientists get mad at OSI. Richards Panel: out of the loop?
Palca J
Science; 1991 Jun; 252(5013):1606-7. PubMed ID: 2047866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Popovic is cleared on all charges; Gallo case in doubt.
Anderson C
Science; 1993 Nov; 262(5136):981-3. PubMed ID: 8235636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Gallo investigation raises new questions.
Science; 1991 Oct; 254(5031):507. PubMed ID: 1948019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Of mice and medicine: balancing scientific needs and animal welfare.
Iglehart JK
Washington Post; 1985 Sep; ():Health Su-15. PubMed ID: 11647799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Gallo challenged on HIV isolates.
Palca J
Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4999):1306. PubMed ID: 2003216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. U.S. inquiry on misconduct in discovery of AIDS virus.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():1, 6. PubMed ID: 11646783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The untold story of HUT78.
Rubinstein E
Science; 1990 Jun; 248(4962):1499-507. PubMed ID: 2193399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Federal science policy. Changing battle lines, new fronts.
Silberner J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(4):6. PubMed ID: 10451832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Baltimore throws in the towel.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1991 May; 252(5007):768, 770. PubMed ID: 1851328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Ethical (and unethical) treatment of animals.
Jackson D
Lancet; 1987 Apr; 1(8539):970. PubMed ID: 11644462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. US Government inquiry bodies dismiss scientific misconduct charges against AIDS researchers.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(22):2665-6. PubMed ID: 8133572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
Poon P
J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Clearing of researcher in 'Baltimore affair' boosts demand for reforms.
Steele F
Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719-20. PubMed ID: 8657264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
Friedly J
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Gallo probe. The Richards panel tosses a curve.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1992 Apr; 256(5053):23. PubMed ID: 1566052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. NIH misconduct probes draw legal complaints.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1990 Jul; 249(4966):240-2. PubMed ID: 2374923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The 'Gallo case': Popovic strikes back.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5302):920-1. PubMed ID: 9053992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
