BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15897747)

  • 1. A preliminary diagnosis service provides prospective blinded dual-review of all general surgical pathology cases in an academic practice.
    Weydert JA; De Young BR; Cohen MB
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2005 Jun; 29(6):801-5. PubMed ID: 15897747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
    Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations on quality control and quality assurance in surgical pathology and autopsy pathology. The Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology.
    Mod Pathol; 1992 Sep; 5(5):567-8. PubMed ID: 1344821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology.
    ; Nakhleh R; Coffin C; Cooper K
    Hum Pathol; 2006 Aug; 37(8):985-8. PubMed ID: 16867860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initial experience with a novel pre-sign-out quality assurance tool for review of random surgical pathology diagnoses in a subspecialty-based university practice.
    Owens SR; Wiehagen LT; Kelly SM; Piccoli AL; Lassige K; Yousem SA; Dhir R; Parwani AV
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1319-23. PubMed ID: 20697250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of turnaround times as a component of quality assurance in surgical pathology.
    Ribé A; Ribalta T; Lledó R; Torras G; Asenjo MA; Cardesa A
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1998 Jun; 10(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 9661063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
    Safrin RE; Bark CJ
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internal quality assurance activities of a surgical pathology department in an Australian teaching hospital.
    Zardawi IM; Bennett G; Jain S; Brown M
    J Clin Pathol; 1998 Sep; 51(9):695-9. PubMed ID: 9930076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast cancer pathology reporting: an audit to compare standards with minimum datasets in a district general hospital.
    Bhatt N; Cotter MM
    Breast J; 2008; 14(1):118-9. PubMed ID: 18186880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Institutional review of outside cytology materials: a retrospective analysis of two institutions' experiences.
    Layfield LJ; Jones C; Rowe L; Gopez EV
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jan; 26(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11782087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Quality control in surgical pathology--analysis of a questionnaire].
    Ishihara A; Hirokawa M; Shimizu M; Yokoyama S; Sakamoto A; Mizuguchi K
    Rinsho Byori; 2002 Jun; 50(6):595-9. PubMed ID: 12166079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence of inter-institutional anatomic pathology slide review: a survey of current practice.
    Gupta D; Layfield LJ
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Feb; 24(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 10680896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance in anatomic pathology. An information system approach.
    Cowan DF
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Feb; 114(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 2302029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance of anatomic pathology diagnoses: Comparison of alternate approaches.
    Layfield LJ; Frazier SR
    Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Feb; 213(2):126-129. PubMed ID: 28040330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality assurance in a department of pathology and anatomy].
    Stalsberg H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Nov; 112(27):3442-5. PubMed ID: 1462310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subspecialty surgical pathologist's performances as triage pathologists on a telepathology-enabled quality assurance surgical pathology service: A human factors study.
    Braunhut BL; Graham AR; Lian F; Webster PD; Krupinski EA; Bhattacharyya AK; Weinstein RS
    J Pathol Inform; 2014; 5(1):18. PubMed ID: 25057432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Prevention of medical incidents and quality assurance in the pathology laboratory].
    Manabe T
    Rinsho Byori; 2003 Mar; 51(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 12707998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Institutional pathology consultation.
    Tsung JS
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2004 Mar; 28(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15104305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.