These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15898364)

  • 1. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
    Rheude B; Sadowsky PL; Ferriera A; Jacobson A
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):300-4. PubMed ID: 15898364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models.
    Whetten JL; Williamson PC; Heo G; Varnhagen C; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 17045148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital images as an alternative to orthodontic casts in assessing malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need.
    Mok CW; Zhou L; McGrath C; Hägg U; Bendeus M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Nov; 65(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 18071959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
    Stevens DR; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Raboud DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
    Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
    Hildebrand JC; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Sivik M; Hans M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 18249296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Logistics in digital orthodontic models.
    Lemay M
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2007; 18(4):25-8. PubMed ID: 18220006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models.
    Mayers M; Firestone AR; Rashid R; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 16214623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual study models: a comparison of modular application systems.
    Favero L; Terrazzani C; Favero V; Stellini E; Cocilovo F
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):16-25. PubMed ID: 20545088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Orthodontic treatment needs and indications assessed with IONT].
    Grzywacz I
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2004; 50(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 16871750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity.
    Bootvong K; Liu Z; McGrath C; Hägg U; Wong RW; Bendeus M; Yeung S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of lateral cephalograms in assessing severity and difficulty of orthodontic cases.
    Pae EK; McKenna GA; Sheehan TJ; Garcia R; Kuhlberg A; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Sep; 120(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 11552124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need scored on plaster and digital models.
    Veenema AC; Katsaros C; Boxum SC; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 19329650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study.
    Asquith J; Gillgrass T; Mossey P
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17974542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach to evaluation of orthodontic record casts.
    Sim JM
    J Gen Orthod; 1992 Dec; 3(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 1308149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of determination of jaw position in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning for adult patients.
    Chang FH; Chen KC; Shiau YY
    Dent Clin North Am; 1997 Jan; 41(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 9023062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pattern of malocclusion in orthodontic patients: a hospital based study.
    Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 19024184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.