These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15898364)

  • 21. Orthodontic care in Sweden. Outcome in three counties.
    Bergström K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 117():1-68. PubMed ID: 8971995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models].
    Jedlińska A
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 19374240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orthodontic treatment need in an accredited graduate orthodontic center in north america: a pilot study.
    Onyeaso CO; BeGole EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 16685299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A system for the simulation and planning of orthodontic treatment using a low cost 3D laser scanner for dental anatomy capturing.
    Alcañiz M; Grau V; Monserrat C; Juan C; Albalat S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():8-14. PubMed ID: 10538404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dental appearance and orthodontic services assessed by 15-16-year-old adolescents in eastern Finland.
    Pietilä T; Pietilä I
    Community Dent Health; 1996 Sep; 13(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 8897736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Treatment outcomes in 3 modes of orthodontic practice.
    Poulton DR; Baumrind S; Vlaskalic V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Feb; 121(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 11840132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Variation of orthodontic treatment decision-making based on dental model type: A systematic review.
    Pachêco-Pereira C; De Luca Canto G; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 25098186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Studies on the need and demand for orthodontic treatment.
    Malmgren O
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1980; (6):1-121. PubMed ID: 6930705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models.
    Koretsi V; Kirschbauer C; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3387-3396. PubMed ID: 30539294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of examiner differences on KIG-classification when assessing malocclusions.
    Gesch D; Kirbschus A; Schröder W; Bernhardt O; Proff P; Bayerlein T; Gedrange T; Kocher T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Mar; 67(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 16570130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Traditional plaster casts and dental digital models: intra-examiner reliability of measurements.
    Mangiacapra R; Butti AC; Salvato A; Biagi R
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 20545091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of agreement in measuring orthodontic treatment need with the modified DHC.
    Bagheban AA; Nourit M; Safavi M
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 May; 24(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 18649558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Epidemiology of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of 12-13-year-old Malaysian schoolchildren.
    Esa R; Razak IA; Allister JH
    Community Dent Health; 2001 Mar; 18(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11421403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they?
    Abizadeh N; Moles DR; O'Neill J; Noar JH
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):151-9. PubMed ID: 22984099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of university and private-practice orthodontic treatment outcomes with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Cook DR; Harris EF; Vaden JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):707-12. PubMed ID: 15953896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models.
    Quimby ML; Vig KW; Rashid RG; Firestone AR
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 15264638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is the Royal London Space Analysis reliable and does it influence orthodontic treatment decisions?
    Al-Abdallah M; Sandler J; O'Brien K
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):503-7. PubMed ID: 18632842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.
    Mullen SR; Martin CA; Ngan P; Gladwin M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 17826603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Subjective assessment of dental and psychosocial effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Birkeland K; Bøe OE; Wisth PJ
    J Orofac Orthop; 1997 Feb; 58(1):44-61. PubMed ID: 9300838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.