BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15898385)

  • 1. Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence.
    Nalbantgil D; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Fulya I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):426-36. PubMed ID: 15898385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance.
    Covell DA; Trammell DW; Boero RP; West R
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 10456598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper.
    Weiland FJ; Ingervall B; Bantleon HP; Droacht H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9228837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.
    Neves LS; Janson G; Cançado RH; de Lima KJ; Fernandes TM; Henriques JF
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):54. PubMed ID: 25182030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy.
    Cope JB; Buschang PH; Cope DD; Parker J; Blackwood HO
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 8010519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric evaluation in different phases of Jasper jumper therapy.
    Herrera FS; Henriques JF; Janson G; Francisconi MF; de Freitas KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):e77-84. PubMed ID: 21803237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
    Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance--a preliminary report.
    Weiland FJ; Bantleon HP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 7572845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment efficiency in skeletal Class II patients treated with the jasper jumper.
    Küçükkeleş N; Ilhan I; Orgun IA
    Angle Orthod; 2007 May; 77(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 17465652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class II correction with the Cantilever Bite Jumper.
    Moro A; Janson G; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Petrelli NE; Lauris JP
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 19216611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes comparison between the Jasper Jumper and Twin Force Bite Corrector in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
    Pinelli Henriques Fontes F; Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):286-296. PubMed ID: 32063473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalization.
    Gelgör IE; Büyükyilmaz T; Karaman AI; Dolanmaz D; Kalayci A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):838-50. PubMed ID: 15673149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.