205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15898385)
21. Class II malocclusion treatment using Jasper Jumper appliance associated to intermaxillary elastics: a case report.
Herrera-Sanches FS; Henriques JF; Janson G; Neves LS; de Lima KJ; Henriques RP; Pieri LV
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):22-9. PubMed ID: 23916428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dentoskeletal effects produced by a Jasper Jumper with an anterior bite plane.
Bassarelli T; Franchi L; Defraia E; Melsen B
Angle Orthod; 2016 Sep; 86(5):775-81. PubMed ID: 26927020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Case report: modified use of the Jasper Jumper appliance in a skeletal Class II mixed dentition case requiring palatal expansion.
Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 9267576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
Bielawska H
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cephalometric changes following simultaneous first and second maxillary molar distalization using a non-compliance intraoral appliance.
Papadopoulos MA; Mavropoulos A; Karamouzos A
J Orofac Orthop; 2004 Mar; 65(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 15206094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the Immediate Dentofacial Changes in Late Adolescent Patients Treated with the Forsus(™) FRD.
Gunay EA; Arun T; Nalbantgil D
Eur J Dent; 2011 Oct; 5(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 22589581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition.
Stucki N; Ingervall B
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 9699405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
Pancherz H
Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
Pancherz H
Am J Orthod; 1982 Aug; 82(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 6961781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation.
Byloff FK; Darendeliler MA
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 9267573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
Calvert FJ
Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Molar distalization with bimetric molar distalization arches.
Küçükkeleş N; Doğanay A
J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1994 Sep; 2(1):399-403. PubMed ID: 9582621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Class II treatment effects with fixed functional appliances: Jasper jumper vs. Forsus fatigue resistant device.
Pupulim DC; Henriques JFC; Freitas KMS; Fontes FPH; Fernandes TMF
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 34219381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Class II malocclusion treatment effects with Jones Jig and Distal Jet followed by fixed appliances.
Vilanova L; Henriques JFC; Janson G; Patel MP; Reis RS; Aliaga-Del Castillo A
Angle Orthod; 2018 Jan; 88(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 28985105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
Aslan BI; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; de Almeida RR; Janson G; Castanha Henriques JF; Pinzan A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
