These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15898385)

  • 41. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dentoskeletal effects of the fast-back molar distalizer followed by fixed appliances.
    Buongiorno M; Iacopetti F; Beretta M; Lanteri C; Defraia E
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Nov; 13(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 23260532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [A study on the module using pendulum combined with straight wire appliance in Angle class II and skeletal class I malocclusion].
    Zhao XG; Liu YH
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 23(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 15954230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Siqueira DF; de Almeira RR; Janson G; Brandão AG; Coelho Filho CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):447.e21-30. PubMed ID: 17418708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of the MARA appliance on the position of the lower anteriors in children, adolescents and adults with Class II malocclusion.
    Gönner U; Ozkan V; Jahn E; Toll DE
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Sep; 68(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 17882366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation.
    Hansen K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992; 88():1-49. PubMed ID: 1492308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation.
    Pancherz H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Stability of Class II, division 1 treatment with the headgear-activator combination followed by the edgewise appliance.
    Janson G; Caffer Dde C; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Neves LS
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):594-604. PubMed ID: 15529492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bondemark L; Karlsson I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16279817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Immediate post-treatment crowned Herbst effects in growing patients.
    Latkauskiene D; Jakobsone G
    Stomatologija; 2012; 14(3):89-92. PubMed ID: 23128491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
    Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of anterior inclined plane treatment on the dentoskeletal of Class II division 1 patients.
    Emami MS; Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2007; 25(3):130-2. PubMed ID: 17951929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dental changes in the mandible during initial Bass appliance therapy.
    Omblus J; Malmgren O
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Feb; 20(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9558761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The use of Twin Force functional fixed orthopedic appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yamazaki MS; Rosário HD; El-Haje O; Alvim-Pereira F; Paranhos LR
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 24812744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Effect of Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II and division I malocclusion: a cephalometric study in 12 patients].
    Luo Y; Fang G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 15747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Treatment effects of headgear biteplane and bionator appliances.
    Almeida-Pedrin RR; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Ferreira FP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17693369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study.
    Escobar SA; Tellez PA; Moncada CA; Villegas CA; Latorre CM; Oberti G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 17418723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Vargervik K; Harvold EP
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 3862347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.