These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15898546)

  • 1. Geometric view of adaptive optics control.
    Wiberg DM; Max CE; Gavel DT
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 May; 22(5):870-80. PubMed ID: 15898546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiconjugate adaptive optics for large telescopes: analytical control of the mirror shapes.
    Owner-Petersen M; Goncharov A
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Mar; 19(3):537-48. PubMed ID: 11876319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numerical simulations of multiconjugate adaptive optics wave-front reconstruction on giant telescopes.
    Ellerbroek BL; Gilles L; Vogel CR
    Appl Opt; 2003 Aug; 42(24):4811-8. PubMed ID: 12952324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal control law for classical and multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Le Roux B; Conan JM; Kulcsár C; Raynaud HF; Mugnier LM; Fusco T
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1261-76. PubMed ID: 15260258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptive-optics performance of Antarctic telescopes.
    Lawrence JS
    Appl Opt; 2004 Feb; 43(6):1435-49. PubMed ID: 15008551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Fusco T; Conan JM; Rousset G; Mugnier LM; Michau V
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Oct; 18(10):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11583270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive optics with four laser guide stars: correction of the cone effect in large telescopes.
    Viard E; Le LM; Hubin N
    Appl Opt; 2002 Jan; 41(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11900425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solar tomography adaptive optics.
    Ren D; Zhu Y; Zhang X; Dou J; Zhao G
    Appl Opt; 2014 Mar; 53(8):1683-96. PubMed ID: 24663427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increase in the compensated field of view with a double-conjugate adaptive-optics system.
    Baharav Y; Shamir J
    Appl Opt; 1995 Apr; 34(12):2102-10. PubMed ID: 21037756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging performance analysis of adaptive optical telescopes using laser guide stars.
    Welsh BM
    Appl Opt; 1991 Dec; 30(34):5021-30. PubMed ID: 20717316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bringing the visible universe into focus with Robo-AO.
    Baranec C; Riddle R; Law NM; Ramaprakash AN; Tendulkar SP; Bui K; Burse MP; Chordia P; Das HK; Davis JT; Dekany RG; Kasliwal MM; Kulkarni SR; Morton TD; Ofek EO; Punnadi S
    J Vis Exp; 2013 Feb; (72):. PubMed ID: 23426078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Widening the effective field of view of adaptive-optics telescopes by deconvolution from wave-front sensing: average and signal-to-noise ratio performance.
    Roggemann MC; Ellerbroek BL; Rhoadarmer TA
    Appl Opt; 1995 Mar; 34(8):1432-44. PubMed ID: 21037680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of curvature-based and Shack-Hartmann-based adaptive optics for the Gemini telescope.
    Rigaut F; Ellerbroek BL; Northcott MJ
    Appl Opt; 1997 May; 36(13):2856-68. PubMed ID: 18253284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundamental limits on isoplanatic correction with multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Lloyd-Hart M; Milton NM
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2003 Oct; 20(10):1949-57. PubMed ID: 14570108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiconjugate adaptive optics results from the laboratory for adaptive optics MCAO/MOAO testbed.
    Laag EA; Ammons SM; Gavel DT; Kupke R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Aug; 25(8):2114-21. PubMed ID: 18677374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for correcting tilt anisoplanatism in laser-guide-star-based multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Ellerbroek BL; Rigaut F
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Oct; 18(10):2539-47. PubMed ID: 11583271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive-optics correction of a stellar interferometer with a single pyramid wave-front sensor.
    Verinaud C; Esposito S
    Opt Lett; 2002 Apr; 27(7):470-2. PubMed ID: 18007834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Isoplanatism in a multiconjugate adaptive optics system.
    Tokovinin A; Le Louarn M; Sarazin M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 Oct; 17(10):1819-27. PubMed ID: 11028530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decoupled stochastic parallel gradient descent optimization for adaptive optics: integrated approach for wave-front sensor information fusion.
    Vorontsov MA
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Feb; 19(2):356-68. PubMed ID: 11822599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robustness study of the pseudo open-loop controller for multiconjugate adaptive optics.
    Piatrou P; Gilles L
    Appl Opt; 2005 Feb; 44(6):1003-10. PubMed ID: 15751691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.