These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15898546)

  • 41. Methods for the characterization of deformable membrane mirrors.
    Booth M; Wilson T; Sun HB; Ota T; Kawata S
    Appl Opt; 2005 Aug; 44(24):5131-9. PubMed ID: 16121800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Statistical properties of the Strehl ratio as a function of pupil diameter and level of adaptive optics correction following atmospheric propagation.
    Shellan JB
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Aug; 21(8):1445-51. PubMed ID: 15330472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fundamental performance comparison of a Hartmann and a shearing interferometer wave-front sensor.
    Welsh BM; Ellerbroek BL; Roggemann MC; Pennington TL
    Appl Opt; 1995 Jul; 34(21):4186-95. PubMed ID: 21052244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of telescope alignment on a stellar interferometer.
    Porro IL; Traub WA; Carleton NP
    Appl Opt; 1999 Oct; 38(28):6055-67. PubMed ID: 18324129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Research on the compensation of laser launch optics to improve the performance of the LGS spot.
    Liu J; Wang J; Wang Y; Tian D; Zheng Q; Lin X; Wang L; Yang Q
    Appl Opt; 2018 Feb; 57(4):648-651. PubMed ID: 29400724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Approach for reconstructing anisoplanatic adaptive optics images.
    Aubailly M; Roggemann MC; Schulz TJ
    Appl Opt; 2007 Aug; 46(24):6055-63. PubMed ID: 17712366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Branch-point reconstruction in laser beam projection through turbulence with finite-degree-of-freedom phase-only wave-front correction.
    Roggemann MC; Koivunen AC
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 Jan; 17(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 10641838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Double-deformable-mirror adaptive optics system for laser beam cleanup using blind optimization.
    Lei X; Wang S; Yan H; Liu W; Dong L; Yang P; Xu B
    Opt Express; 2012 Sep; 20(20):22143-57. PubMed ID: 23037363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Breadboard testing of a phase-conjugate engine with an interferometric wave-front sensor and a microelectromechanical systems-based spatial light modulator.
    Baker KL; Stappaerts EA; Gavel D; Wilks SC; Tucker J; Silva DA; Olsen J; Olivier SS; Young PE; Kartz MW; Flath LM; Krulevitch P; Crawford J; Azucena O
    Appl Opt; 2004 Oct; 43(30):5585-93. PubMed ID: 15534988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An adaptive optics imaging system based on a high-resolution liquid crystal on silicon device.
    Mu Q; Cao Z; Hu L; Li D; Xuan L
    Opt Express; 2006 Sep; 14(18):8013-8. PubMed ID: 19529171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Measurement of telescope aberrations through atmospheric turbulence by use of phase diversity.
    Baba N; Mutoh K
    Appl Opt; 2001 Feb; 40(4):544-52. PubMed ID: 18357030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Broadband, static wave-front generation: Na-Ag ion-exchange phase screens and telescope emulation.
    Butler DJ; Hippler S; Egner S; Xu W; Bähr J
    Appl Opt; 2004 May; 43(14):2813-23. PubMed ID: 15143804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Generalized Fried parameter after adaptive optics partial wave-front compensation.
    Cagigal MP; Canales VF
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 May; 17(5):903-10. PubMed ID: 10795639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Separating atmospheric layers in adaptive optics.
    Ribak EN
    Opt Lett; 2003 Apr; 28(8):613-5. PubMed ID: 12703917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Binary adaptive optics: atmospheric wave-front correction with a half-wave phase shifter.
    Love GD; Andrews N; Birch P; Buscher D; Doel P; Dunlop C; Major J; Myers R; Purvis A; Sharples R; Vick A; Zadrozny A; Restaino SR; Glindemann A
    Appl Opt; 1995 Sep; 34(27):6058-66. PubMed ID: 21060444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Experimental validation of Fourier-transform wave-front reconstruction at the Palomar Observatory.
    Poyneer LA; Troy M; Macintosh B; Gavel DT
    Opt Lett; 2003 May; 28(10):798-800. PubMed ID: 12779150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Stellar scintillations as a remote atmospheric wave-front sensor.
    Ribak EN; Gershnik E; Cheselka M
    Opt Lett; 1996 Mar; 21(6):435-7. PubMed ID: 19865430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Order-N sparse minimum-variance open-loop reconstructor for extreme adaptive optics.
    Gilles L
    Opt Lett; 2003 Oct; 28(20):1927-9. PubMed ID: 14587778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Iterative wave-front reconstruction in the Fourier domain.
    Bond CZ; Correia CM; Sauvage JF; Neichel B; Fusco T
    Opt Express; 2017 May; 25(10):11452-11465. PubMed ID: 28788711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Adaptive optics based on analog parallel stochastic optimization: analysis and experimental demonstration.
    Vorontsov MA; Carhart GW; Cohen M; Cauwenberghs G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1440-53. PubMed ID: 10935872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.