BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15898658)

  • 1. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2086-98. PubMed ID: 12430820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights.
    Alexander JM; Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2234-47. PubMed ID: 15532655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G; Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Walsh M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 3(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 12162362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Roverud E; Swaminathan J; Jennings T; Clayton K; Steven Colburn H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):440. PubMed ID: 30710924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    Hear Res; 1998 Apr; 118(1-2):139-50. PubMed ID: 9606069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Wojtczak M; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 20649220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.
    Oxenham AJ; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74. PubMed ID: 7876438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.