These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15898661)

  • 21. Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types.
    Wolfe V; Cornell R; Palmer C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 2072674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
    Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Required number of tokens to determine representative voice perturbation values.
    Scherer RC; Vail VJ; Guo CG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 38(6):1260-9. PubMed ID: 8747819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The aging voice.
    Mueller PB
    Semin Speech Lang; 1997 May; 18(2):159-68; quiz 168-9. PubMed ID: 9195688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization.
    Uloza V; Padervinskis E; Uloziene I; Saferis V; Verikas A
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer and vocal intensity in children with phonological disorders.
    Wertzner HF; Schreiber S; Amaro L
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2005; 71(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 16612518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
    Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliable acoustic measurements in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years: Gender, age, height and weight effects on fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer in phonations without and with controlled voice SPL.
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Beyer D; Bohlender JE
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2035-42. PubMed ID: 26412461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laryngeal perturbation analysis: minimum length of analysis window.
    Karnell MP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):544-8. PubMed ID: 2072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vocal Characteristics of Elderly Women Engaged in Aerobics in Private Institutions of Salvador, Bahia.
    Colman Machado de Machado F; Cielo CA; Lessa MM; Barbosa LH
    J Voice; 2016 Jan; 30(1):127.e9-19. PubMed ID: 25795360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ceptral voice analysis: link with perception and stroboscopy.
    Dejonckere PH
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(4):245-6. PubMed ID: 9865099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
    Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences in self-rated, perceived, and acoustic voice qualities between high- and low-fatigue groups.
    Cho SW; Yin CS; Park YB; Park YJ
    J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 21051198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.
    Brockmann-Bauser M; Bohlender JE; Mehta DD
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 28528786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustic parameters for the evaluation of voice quality in patients with voice disorders.
    Li G; Hou Q; Zhang C; Jiang Z; Gong S
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jan; 10(1):130-136. PubMed ID: 33440977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of experience on judgments of adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Nicolici C; Baylor C; Almand K; Waugh P; Maronian N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2007 Sep; 116(9):695-701. PubMed ID: 17926593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of sustained phonation at high and low pitch on vocal jitter and shimmer.
    Verstraete J; Forrez G; Mertens P; Debruyne F
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1993; 45(5):223-8. PubMed ID: 8253445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective measures of breathy voice quality obtained using an auditory model.
    Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2217-24. PubMed ID: 14587619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.